Rabbi Yaakov Menken
Byline seen at JNS.
person
2 reports under this byline
2 outlets
0 bias readings
0 claims checked
25 Sep 2026 → 25 Sep 2026
Roles
| Outlet | Role | From | To | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
J
JNS
Right
estimate · not a score
JNS
🇮🇱IL ·
digital ·
What we have measured
Allegation described neutrally The headline describes the suit as a request for records on editorial standards, with Israel coverage one part of it. ×1Army claim attributed The army's legal justification is attributed to the army. ×1Army's term in the headline the headline adopts 'terror assets' in its own voice, without attribution ×1Army term in the headline The headline uses the army's own phrase without quotation marks. The body attributes only the ceasefire line to the army. ×1
Outlet profile in The AI Times →
|
byline | — | present | — |
|
A
Arutz Sheva
Right
estimate · not a score
Arutz Sheva
🇮🇱IL ·
digital ·
What we have measured
A caveat kept in the only report we hold that says the rejection was of a promo, not the finished film ×1A different word, and a hedge Calls the same event an airstrike rather than a controlled demolition, and marks it "Reported" while offering footage as its evidence. ×1An allegation stated as established the headline presents the plan as fact and as a disclosure, with no attribution to the charge sheet ×1Asserted flat Calls it a 'terror network' and says Iran helped build it, in its own voice, with no source. ×1
Outlet profile in The AI Times →
|
byline | — | present | — |
Bias we have measured on this byline
Nothing scored on this byline yet.
From 2 reports we hold under this byline, at
Arutz Sheva, JNS.
Two independent readings, each made without the masthead, with the quote attached to every tag. We do not carry a rating for any
journalist — only what we have measured from published text, and a verdict on a
claim is a verdict on that sentence, not on the person who filed it.
