Ahmed Al-Haj
Byline seen at The Independent.
person
2 reports under this byline
1 outlet
5 bias readings
1 claim checked
10 Sep 2026 → 15 Oct 2026
Roles
| Outlet | Role | From | To | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
The Independent
Centre-left
estimate · not a score
The Independent
🇬🇧UK ·
digital · independent
What we have measured
Accused party response Russia's side is reported as no comment. ×1A company statement about itself, taken as a "reveals" rather than "says", for a company's account of its own product ×1A count stated flat four crimes is given as a settled number in the headline, with no court, charge or jurisdiction attached ×1Actor named No actor named for the cut-short or for the clashes ×1
Outlet profile in The AI Times →
|
byline | — | present | — |
Bias we have measured on this byline
Headline claims more than the body the headline asserts the consequence for the truce; the body carries the entry only on residents' word ×1Hedging applied symmetrically the same non-verification line is attached to the residents' account and to the other side's airstrike count ×1How a party is named one armed party carries a foreign-sponsor label at first mention, the other is named by the state it serves ×1How the advancing force is named named by its foreign patron in the first line, before anything it did ×1
Claims we checked that rest on their reporting:
1 true
From 2 reports we hold under this byline, at
The Independent.
Two independent readings, each made without the masthead, with the quote attached to every tag. We do not carry a rating for any
journalist — only what we have measured from published text, and a verdict on a
claim is a verdict on that sentence, not on the person who filed it.
Headlines they wrote
