The AI Times
All desks
Read another desk
All Geopolitics & international affairsEconomyUnited StatesAnglosphereEuropeRussia & EurasiaLevant & Iran Gulf & Türkiye North Africa Africa South Asia East Asia Latin America Energy Technology Media Watch
Sections
News Panel Outlets Headlines Analysis & editorial coming soon
Who we are Alerts Pricing Sign in / up
Desks
All Geopolitics & international affairsEconomyUnited StatesAnglosphereEuropeRussia & EurasiaLevant & Iran Gulf & Türkiye North Africa Africa South Asia East Asia Latin America Energy Technology Media Watch
The AI Times
every claim sourced| every source shown| always on watch

Kaelan Deese

Byline seen at Washington Examiner.

person
65 reports under this byline 1 outlet 16 bias readings 10 claims checked 8 Sep 2026 → 29 Oct 2026

Roles

OutletRoleFromToSource
Washington Examiner
Right estimate · not a score
Washington Examiner 🇺🇸US · newspaper · independent No report held from this outlet on this story. What we have measured Accusation printed unanswered a named candidate is accused of responsibility for murders, with no response carried ×1Accused named Names one accused student, citing the lawsuit; no other report we hold names any of the accused ×1Accused named Names each person charged and gives their nationality. None of the defendants is quoted. ×1Accused named Names one accused student from the civil filing and attributes the claim to the lawsuit ×1 from 3425 articles we hold · quote attached Outlet profile in The AI Times →
byline—present —

Bias we have measured on this byline

A figure with what it counts the scale number is dated and sourced to the decision ×1Asymmetric verb The rival report's account gets 'claimed'. The unnamed source's denial is printed as a flat quote. ×1Both accounts attributed gives the officials' account and the witnesses' account the same 'said' treatment, one after the other ×1Characterisation in reporter's voice The closing line calls Smith's tactics 'aggressive' as a plain statement, not as a quote from anyone. ×1
Claims we checked that rest on their reporting: 2 disputed1 unverified7 true
From 65 reports we hold under this byline, at Washington Examiner. Two independent readings, each made without the masthead, with the quote attached to every tag. We do not carry a rating for any journalist — only what we have measured from published text, and a verdict on a claim is a verdict on that sentence, not on the person who filed it.

Headlines they wrote

Sign in to The AI Times

Everything is free while we are building it. Signing in is how comments, likes and your reading stay yours.

Continue with Google

Sign-in is coming soon.

By continuing you agree to be a reader of a paper that shows its working.

×