The AI Times
All desks
Read another desk
All Geopolitics & international affairsEconomyUnited StatesAnglosphereEuropeRussia & EurasiaLevant & Iran Gulf & Türkiye North Africa Africa South Asia East Asia Latin America Energy Technology Media Watch
Sections
News Panel Outlets Headlines Analysis & editorial coming soon
Who we are Alerts Pricing Sign in / up
Desks
All Geopolitics & international affairsEconomyUnited StatesAnglosphereEuropeRussia & EurasiaLevant & Iran Gulf & Türkiye North Africa Africa South Asia East Asia Latin America Energy Technology Media Watch
The AI Times
every claim sourced| every source shown| always on watch

John Shu

Byline seen at National Review.

person
2 reports under this byline 2 outlets 0 bias readings 0 claims checked 14 Sep 2026 → 9 Oct 2026

Roles

OutletRoleFromToSource
National Review
Centre-right estimate · not a score
National Review 🇺🇸US · magazine · independent No report held from this outlet on this story. What we have measured Asserted not attributed Doubt about the allegation is stated flat, in the outlet's own voice ×1Asserted not attributed An argument about deterrence is stated as fact ×1Asserted versus attributed calls it an abuse of power in its own voice ×1Asserted versus attributed 'Abuse of presidential power' is stated flat ×1 from 414 articles we hold · quote attached Outlet profile in The AI Times →
byline—present —
SCOTUSblog
Centre estimate · not a score
SCOTUSblog 🇺🇸US · digital · independent No report held from this outlet on this story. What we have measured Cause given as fact the postal rule is traced to Trump personally, unattributed ×1Headline is a reaction, not a ruling the loser's response is the headline; the order itself is not in it ×1Headline with no actor and no outcome the docket is the subject; neither judge nor result appears ×1Hedged or stated flat the headline states a verdict about the court's motives as fact ×1 from 177 articles we hold · quote attached Outlet profile in The AI Times →
byline—present —

Bias we have measured on this byline

Nothing scored on this byline yet.
From 2 reports we hold under this byline, at SCOTUSblog, National Review. Two independent readings, each made without the masthead, with the quote attached to every tag. We do not carry a rating for any journalist — only what we have measured from published text, and a verdict on a claim is a verdict on that sentence, not on the person who filed it.

Headlines they wrote

Sign in to The AI Times

Everything is free while we are building it. Signing in is how comments, likes and your reading stay yours.

Continue with Google

Sign-in is coming soon.

By continuing you agree to be a reader of a paper that shows its working.

×