Akhil Amar
Byline seen at SCOTUSblog.
person
2 reports under this byline
1 outlet
6 bias readings
2 claims checked
9 Sep 2026 → 10 Sep 2026
Roles
| Outlet | Role | From | To | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
SCOTUSblog
Centre
estimate · not a score
SCOTUSblog
🇺🇸US ·
digital · independent
What we have measured
Cause given as fact the postal rule is traced to Trump personally, unattributed ×1Headline is a reaction, not a ruling the loser's response is the headline; the order itself is not in it ×1Headline with no actor and no outcome the docket is the subject; neither judge nor result appears ×1Hedged or stated flat the headline states a verdict about the court's motives as fact ×1
Outlet profile in The AI Times →
|
byline | — | present | — |
Bias we have measured on this byline
Measure chosen the outcome is counted in House seats, before and after ×1One party named as the moving party Republicans are named as asking the court to intervene; nobody is named on the other side ×1Stated not attributed a legal and political judgement asserted flat, with no source ×1Verb choice headline approves of the ruling rather than reporting it ×1
Claims we checked that rest on their reporting:
1 unverified1 true
From 2 reports we hold under this byline, at
SCOTUSblog.
Two independent readings, each made without the masthead, with the quote attached to every tag. We do not carry a rating for any
journalist — only what we have measured from published text, and a verdict on a
claim is a verdict on that sentence, not on the person who filed it.
