The AI Times
All desks
Read another desk
All Geopolitics & international affairsEconomyUnited StatesAnglosphereEuropeRussia & EurasiaLevant & Iran Gulf & Türkiye North Africa Africa South Asia East Asia Latin America Energy Technology Media Watch
Sections
News Panel Outlets Headlines Analysis & editorial coming soon
Who we are Alerts Pricing Sign in / up
Desks
All Geopolitics & international affairsEconomyUnited StatesAnglosphereEuropeRussia & EurasiaLevant & Iran Gulf & Türkiye North Africa Africa South Asia East Asia Latin America Energy Technology Media Watch
The AI Times
every claim sourced| every source shown| always on watch

Саша Лукьяненко

Byline seen at Vot Tak.

person
78 reports under this byline 1 outlet 6 bias readings 4 claims checked 6 Sep 2026 → 30 Oct 2026

Roles

OutletRoleFromToSource
V Vot Tak
Centre-left estimate · not a score
Vot Tak 🇧🇾BY · digital · No report held from this outlet on this story. What we have measured Accusation attributed War-crimes accusations are attributed to Ukraine's law enforcement, not stated as fact ×1Accusation attributed The war-crimes accusation is correctly attributed to Ukrainian law enforcement, not asserted. ×1Actor named names Ukraine's armed forces in the headline and Ukrainian drones in the text ×1Actor named for the killing the authorities are the subject of the seizure and destruction rather than the cattle being 'subject to destruction' ×1 from 685 articles we hold · quote attached Outlet profile in The AI Times →
byline—present —

Bias we have measured on this byline

Attribution inside the sentence the only report that sources the delay to a government rather than to a spokesman's denial ×1No actor named passive voice leaves the drone with no sender; the near-miss is attributed to Norway's prime minister ×1What is attributed the delay is attributed to the Moldovan government, in the sentence ×1Whose voice is quoted the damage claim is sourced to a monitoring channel and hedged ×1
Claims we checked that rest on their reporting: 2 disputed2 unverified
From 78 reports we hold under this byline, at Vot Tak. Two independent readings, each made without the masthead, with the quote attached to every tag. We do not carry a rating for any journalist — only what we have measured from published text, and a verdict on a claim is a verdict on that sentence, not on the person who filed it.

Headlines they wrote

Sign in to The AI Times

Everything is free while we are building it. Signing in is how comments, likes and your reading stay yours.

Continue with Google

Sign-in is coming soon.

By continuing you agree to be a reader of a paper that shows its working.

×