Rory Carroll
Byline seen at The Guardian.
person
20 reports under this byline
2 outlets
6 bias readings
3 claims checked
6 Sep 2026 → 28 Oct 2026
Roles
| Outlet | Role | From | To | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
The Guardian
Centre-left
estimate · not a score
The Guardian
🇬🇧UK ·
newspaper · independent
What we have measured
Actor named Denial in the passive voice, with no one named as the person who dismissed it ×1Actor named names Israel as acting and states the death toll flat, with no source ×1Actor named Ireland named as the side that ended the conference ×1Allegation omitted the police statement is cut with an ellipsis where the other two reports carry the controlling or coercive behaviour allegation ×1
Outlet profile in The AI Times →
|
byline | — | present | — |
The Independent
Centre-left
estimate · not a score
The Independent
🇬🇧UK ·
digital · independent
What we have measured
Accused party response Russia's side is reported as no comment. ×1A company statement about itself, taken as a "reveals" rather than "says", for a company's account of its own product ×1A count stated flat four crimes is given as a settled number in the headline, with no court, charge or jurisdiction attached ×1Actor named No actor named for the cut-short or for the clashes ×1
Outlet profile in The AI Times →
|
byline | — | present | — |
Bias we have measured on this byline
Asserted vs attributed A national mood is stated in the report's own voice, with no source ×1Asserted vs attributed The report states the president's hostility in its own voice, as an impression, not as her words. ×1Characterisation The president's feelings are described by the reporter, not quoted ×1Framing of actor The visiting president is framed by a slip of his, set up to mock; his side gets no reply. ×1
Claims we checked that rest on their reporting:
1 unverified2 true
From 20 reports we hold under this byline, at
The Guardian, The Independent.
Two independent readings, each made without the masthead, with the quote attached to every tag. We do not carry a rating for any
journalist — only what we have measured from published text, and a verdict on a
claim is a verdict on that sentence, not on the person who filed it.
Headlines they wrote
