David Vine
Byline seen at The Intercept.
person
2 reports under this byline
2 outlets
0 bias readings
0 claims checked
1 Oct 2026 → 1 Oct 2026
Roles
| Outlet | Role | From | To | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
The Intercept
Left
estimate · not a score
The Intercept
🇺🇸US ·
digital · independent
What we have measured
Asserted vs attributed The headline states where the money went as fact. It rests on the outlet's own reading of tax forms. ×1Own analysis stated flat The headline sets Kraft's words as a claim against the report's own reading of tax forms, which it states as fact. ×1What the year is measured in people who lost jobs and have not got them back ×1Who is counted as hurt people who lost work are the ones counted as harmed a year on ×1
Outlet profile in The AI Times →
|
byline | — | present | — |
Mother Jones
Left
estimate · not a score
Mother Jones
🇺🇸US ·
magazine · independent
What we have measured
Asserted, not attributed 'ultra-gerrymandered' stated as fact ×1Asserted versus attributed 'Cover-up' is asserted in the report's own voice, not attributed ×1Asserted versus attributed calls it a cover-up in its own voice ×1Assertion vs attribution describes the operation as a 'violent occupation' in its own voice, with no source for the phrase ×1
Outlet profile in The AI Times →
|
byline | — | present | — |
Bias we have measured on this byline
Nothing scored on this byline yet.
From 2 reports we hold under this byline, at
Mother Jones, The Intercept.
Two independent readings, each made without the masthead, with the quote attached to every tag. We do not carry a rating for any
journalist — only what we have measured from published text, and a verdict on a
claim is a verdict on that sentence, not on the person who filed it.
Headlines they wrote
