The AI Times
All desks
Read another desk
All Geopolitics & international affairsEconomyUnited StatesAnglosphereEuropeRussia & EurasiaLevant & Iran Gulf & Türkiye North Africa Africa South Asia East Asia Latin America Energy Technology Media Watch
Sections
News Panel Outlets Headlines Analysis & editorial coming soon
Who we are Alerts Pricing Sign in / up
Desks
All Geopolitics & international affairsEconomyUnited StatesAnglosphereEuropeRussia & EurasiaLevant & Iran Gulf & Türkiye North Africa Africa South Asia East Asia Latin America Energy Technology Media Watch
The AI Times
every claim sourced| every source shown| always on watch

Cristina Sava

Byline seen at Digi24.

person
193 reports under this byline 1 outlet 22 bias readings 10 claims checked 7 Sep 2026 → 30 Oct 2026

Roles

OutletRoleFromToSource
Digi24
Centre estimate · not a score
Digi24 🇷🇴RO · TV/radio · independent No report held from this outlet on this story. What we have measured A judgement of the Union quoted in the headline the premier's verdict on the Union printed as the headline claim ×1Asserted vs attributed states flat, with no source, that the attackers were separate from the shepherds ×1Asserted vs attributed States flat that the document is fake; another report sources this to the Order's ambassador ×1Attributed, not asserted Russia's account of where the strike happened is given to the Kremlin, with the news agency chain named ×1 from 5389 articles we hold · quote attached Outlet profile in The AI Times →
byline—present —

Bias we have measured on this byline

Attribution and dating names the prosecutors, the day they confirmed it, the day it was found and the village; describes the warhead as fragmentation ×1Causal framing The headline casts Lithuania's step as the cause of Moscow's reaction. ×1Cause passed on as a claim Moscow's explanation headlined, in quotation marks ×1Claim carried without a figure the affordability claim is quoted in the headline with no cost, no offset and no total anywhere in the text ×1
Claims we checked that rest on their reporting: 1 misleading1 disputed4 unverified4 true
From 193 reports we hold under this byline, at Digi24. Two independent readings, each made without the masthead, with the quote attached to every tag. We do not carry a rating for any journalist — only what we have measured from published text, and a verdict on a claim is a verdict on that sentence, not on the person who filed it.

Headlines they wrote

Sign in to The AI Times

Everything is free while we are building it. Signing in is how comments, likes and your reading stay yours.

Continue with Google

Sign-in is coming soon.

By continuing you agree to be a reader of a paper that shows its working.

×