The AI Times
Economy
Read another desk
All Geopolitics & international affairsEconomyUnited StatesAnglosphereEuropeRussia & EurasiaLevant & Iran Gulf & Türkiye North Africa Africa South Asia East Asia Latin America Energy Technology Media Watch
Sections
News Panel Outlets Headlines Analysis & editorial coming soon
Registers
All news Outlets Journalists
Who we are Alerts Pricing Sign in / up
Desks
All Geopolitics & international affairsEconomyUnited StatesAnglosphereEuropeRussia & EurasiaLevant & Iran Gulf & Türkiye North Africa Africa South Asia East Asia Latin America Energy Technology Media Watch
The AI Times
every claim sourced| every source shown| always on watch

'Blacklisting', says the New York Times; 'sanctions', says Der Standard; a 'security risk', says UPI: three words for one court ruling on Anthropic

A federal appeals court in Washington let the Pentagon keep Anthropic, which makes the Claude AI models, out of defence contracts. All four reports we hold agree on the outcome. They use three different words for what the Pentagon did, and only one says why the dispute began.

Federal appeals court upholds Pentagon’s supply-chain-risk designation of Anthropic
Federal appeals court upholds Pentagon’s supply-chain-risk designation of Anthropic as published by Washington Examiner · seen at Washington Examiner
Economy United States

The ruling. A federal appeals court in Washington sided with the Pentagon on Friday, 25 September. UPI reports that the government can designate Anthropic a national security risk and bar it from Pentagon contracts. All four reports agree on that outcome.

Four reports, three words.

Outlet Its word for the measure What only it carries
The New York Times "Blacklisting" (headline) The court's words: the Pentagon had "ample support for its conclusion"
Washington Examiner "effective blacklisting" (body), "designation" (headline) A 2-1 vote; the listing dated to March
UPI "designate Anthropic a national security risk" The bar on Pentagon contracts
Der Standard "Sanktionen" (sanctions) The dispute began in February, after Anthropic "spoke out against military use"

Why the word matters. A designation is a government finding about risk. A blacklisting, or sanctions, reads as a penalty. Two of the four reports say "blacklisting" and one says "sanctions". Only UPI uses the government's own term.

Missing voices. The text we hold of each report quotes neither Anthropic nor the Pentagon. The Times carries the court's reasoning. No report we hold carries a reply from the company.

What is not settled - The vote. Only the Washington Examiner reports a 2-1 split. - The cause. Only Der Standard says why the dispute began. No second report confirms it. - What comes next. No report says whether Anthropic will appeal. - The cost. No report puts a figure on the contracts involved.

This story is about whether the US government may shut an artificial intelligence company out of military work on national-security grounds, and whether a court will second-guess it.

How it got here. Anthropic is a San Francisco company founded in 2021 by former OpenAI staff. It makes Claude, a family of AI models sold to businesses and governments. Its published usage policy sets limits on how its models may be used, including for weapons. Like its main rivals, it had moved into US government and defence work. According to Der Standard, a dispute with the Pentagon began in February 2026 after Anthropic objected to military use of its products. The Washington Examiner reports that the Pentagon listed Anthropic as a supply-chain risk in March. That listing is what the court has now upheld.

The actors. - The Pentagon. It is the US Department of Defense. Since a September 2025 executive order it also uses the name Department of War, which is why the Examiner writes "War Department". It buys weapons, software and services for the US armed forces. - Anthropic. It is one of a small number of companies that build the most capable AI models. - The court. This is the federal appeals court in Washington, which hears many challenges to decisions by federal agencies. Der Standard reports that the court held this decision belongs to the president and the defence secretary.

What is at stake. Few firms can supply frontier AI models. If the government can exclude one of them, fewer companies can compete for defence contracts. Every supplier also learns how much room it has to put conditions on how its products are used. A ruling the other way would have limited the executive branch's power to choose its suppliers on security grounds.

Where it stands. The Pentagon's designation stands. The reports we hold do not say whether Anthropic will seek a further appeal.

What is being argued about

  • What to call the measure: a designation, a blacklisting or sanctions
  • Whether the court was split, which only one report gives
  • Why the dispute began, which only one report says
  • Who decides who supplies the military: the court, the president or the defence secretary
One ruling, four accountsSide by side
OutletWord for the measureVote split given?Cause of the dispute given?
The New York Times"Blacklisting"NoNo
Washington Examiner"effective blacklisting"Yes: 2-1No; dates the listing to March
UPI"designate ... a national security risk"NoNo
Der Standard"Sanktionen" (sanctions)NoYes: after Anthropic spoke out against military use
Words are quoted from each report's headline or text. The New York Times and UPI reports we hold are the opening lines only.
Sources The New York Times
Centre-left estimate · not a score
The New York Times 🇺🇸US · newspaper · independent Anthropic’s Blacklisting by the Pentagon Was Legal, Federal Judges Rule Open this report in The AI Times → Read it at The New York Times → What we have measured Active and passive voice the ship is 'targeted' with no actor, one sentence before a named actor is given for the Saudi attack ×1Active vs passive voice Pike is named as the killer in the active voice; the botched execution has no actor named ×1Actor label Names the shooter by its backer, not by its own name. ×1Actor named Names the official and what the process did to Pike. ×1 from 3862 articles we hold · quote attached Outlet profile in The AI Times → Washington Examiner
Right estimate · not a score
Washington Examiner 🇺🇸US · newspaper · independent Federal appeals court upholds Pentagon’s supply-chain-risk designation of Anthropic Open this report in The AI Times → Read it at Washington Examiner → What we have measured Accusation printed unanswered a named candidate is accused of responsibility for murders, with no response carried ×1Accused named Names one accused student, citing the lawsuit; no other report we hold names any of the accused ×1Accused named Names each person charged and gives their nationality. None of the defendants is quoted. ×1Accused named Names one accused student from the civil filing and attributes the claim to the lawsuit ×1 from 3435 articles we hold · quote attached Outlet profile in The AI Times → UPI
Centre estimate · not a score
UPI 🇺🇸US · wire · independent Appeals court sides with Pentagon on labeling Anthropic security risk Open this report in The AI Times → Read it at UPI → What we have measured Actor named in the body the court is the subject and three co-defendants are counted but unnamed ×1Administration named as acting The report states the ruling as the administration's power to designate and to bar, in the administration's own terms. ×1Asserted versus attributed states flat that nothing was revealed, while other reports carry Xi's stated positions ×1Completeness stated flat presents the withdrawal as a full end, with no mention of forces nearby ×1 from 2371 articles we hold · quote attached Outlet profile in The AI Times → Der Standard
Centre-left estimate · not a score
Der Standard 🇦🇹AT · newspaper · independent US-Justiz: Pentagon darf Sanktionen gegen Anthropic aufrecht erhalten Open this report in The AI Times → Read it at Der Standard → What we have measured Actor named NATO is named as acting; it 'foiled' the manoeuvre ×1Actor named dead uncounted The US is named as the attacker and stated flat, but the dead schoolchildren are neither counted nor named ×1Actors left unnamed the three requesting states are counted, never named ×1Aim attributed and quoted the stated aim is in quotation marks and marked as the service's account ×1 from 7330 articles we hold · quote attached Outlet profile in The AI Times →
From dispute to rulingTimeline
  1. 2026-02— no time published Der Standard The dispute begins after Anthropic speaks out against military use of its productsNo other report we hold gives a cause
  2. 2026-03— no time published Washington Examiner The Pentagon lists Anthropic as a supply-chain riskNo other report we hold gives a date
  3. 2026-09-25— no time published Federal appeals court, Washington The court upholds the Pentagon's designation 2-1Only the Washington Examiner gives the split
  4. 2026-09-2518:17 UTC published time of the report The New York Times "Blacklisting ... Was Legal"None
  5. 2026-09-2518:17 UTC published time of the report Washington Examiner "effective blacklisting"None
  6. 2026-09-2518:35 UTC published time of the report Der Standard "Sanktionen" (sanctions)None
  7. 2026-09-2518:42 UTC published time of the report UPI "national security risk"None
The February and March dates each come from a single report.
Sources Der Standard
Centre-left estimate · not a score
Der Standard 🇦🇹AT · newspaper · independent US-Justiz: Pentagon darf Sanktionen gegen Anthropic aufrecht erhalten Open this report in The AI Times → Read it at Der Standard → What we have measured Actor named NATO is named as acting; it 'foiled' the manoeuvre ×1Actor named dead uncounted The US is named as the attacker and stated flat, but the dead schoolchildren are neither counted nor named ×1Actors left unnamed the three requesting states are counted, never named ×1Aim attributed and quoted the stated aim is in quotation marks and marked as the service's account ×1 from 7330 articles we hold · quote attached Outlet profile in The AI Times → Washington Examiner
Right estimate · not a score
Washington Examiner 🇺🇸US · newspaper · independent Federal appeals court upholds Pentagon’s supply-chain-risk designation of Anthropic Open this report in The AI Times → Read it at Washington Examiner → What we have measured Accusation printed unanswered a named candidate is accused of responsibility for murders, with no response carried ×1Accused named Names one accused student, citing the lawsuit; no other report we hold names any of the accused ×1Accused named Names each person charged and gives their nationality. None of the defendants is quoted. ×1Accused named Names one accused student from the civil filing and attributes the claim to the lawsuit ×1 from 3435 articles we hold · quote attached Outlet profile in The AI Times → The New York Times
Centre-left estimate · not a score
The New York Times 🇺🇸US · newspaper · independent Anthropic’s Blacklisting by the Pentagon Was Legal, Federal Judges Rule Open this report in The AI Times → Read it at The New York Times → What we have measured Active and passive voice the ship is 'targeted' with no actor, one sentence before a named actor is given for the Saudi attack ×1Active vs passive voice Pike is named as the killer in the active voice; the botched execution has no actor named ×1Actor label Names the shooter by its backer, not by its own name. ×1Actor named Names the official and what the process did to Pike. ×1 from 3862 articles we hold · quote attached Outlet profile in The AI Times → UPI
Centre estimate · not a score
UPI 🇺🇸US · wire · independent Appeals court sides with Pentagon on labeling Anthropic security risk Open this report in The AI Times → Read it at UPI → What we have measured Actor named in the body the court is the subject and three co-defendants are counted but unnamed ×1Administration named as acting The report states the ruling as the administration's power to designate and to bar, in the administration's own terms. ×1Asserted versus attributed states flat that nothing was revealed, while other reports carry Xi's stated positions ×1Completeness stated flat presents the withdrawal as a full end, with no mention of forces nearby ×1 from 2371 articles we hold · quote attached Outlet profile in The AI Times →
The bias in this coverageBias

Three words for one measure

The four reports use 'blacklisting', 'security risk designation' and 'sanctions' for the same measure. Only one says the vote was split. Only one gives the company's reason for the dispute.

2 reports that say 'blacklisting' 1 reports that say 'sanctions' 1 reports that give the 2-1 split 1 reports that give the company's reason for the dispute
Scored without the mastheads. Where the two passes differ, both are kept.
Sources Washington Examiner
Right estimate · not a score
Washington Examiner 🇺🇸US · newspaper · independent Federal appeals court upholds Pentagon’s supply-chain-risk designation of Anthropic Open this report in The AI Times → Read it at Washington Examiner → What we have measured Accusation printed unanswered a named candidate is accused of responsibility for murders, with no response carried ×1Accused named Names one accused student, citing the lawsuit; no other report we hold names any of the accused ×1Accused named Names each person charged and gives their nationality. None of the defendants is quoted. ×1Accused named Names one accused student from the civil filing and attributes the claim to the lawsuit ×1 from 3435 articles we hold · quote attached Outlet profile in The AI Times → The New York Times
Centre-left estimate · not a score
The New York Times 🇺🇸US · newspaper · independent Anthropic’s Blacklisting by the Pentagon Was Legal, Federal Judges Rule Open this report in The AI Times → Read it at The New York Times → What we have measured Active and passive voice the ship is 'targeted' with no actor, one sentence before a named actor is given for the Saudi attack ×1Active vs passive voice Pike is named as the killer in the active voice; the botched execution has no actor named ×1Actor label Names the shooter by its backer, not by its own name. ×1Actor named Names the official and what the process did to Pike. ×1 from 3862 articles we hold · quote attached Outlet profile in The AI Times → UPI
Centre estimate · not a score
UPI 🇺🇸US · wire · independent Appeals court sides with Pentagon on labeling Anthropic security risk Open this report in The AI Times → Read it at UPI → What we have measured Actor named in the body the court is the subject and three co-defendants are counted but unnamed ×1Administration named as acting The report states the ruling as the administration's power to designate and to bar, in the administration's own terms. ×1Asserted versus attributed states flat that nothing was revealed, while other reports carry Xi's stated positions ×1Completeness stated flat presents the withdrawal as a full end, with no mention of forces nearby ×1 from 2371 articles we hold · quote attached Outlet profile in The AI Times → Der Standard
Centre-left estimate · not a score
Der Standard 🇦🇹AT · newspaper · independent US-Justiz: Pentagon darf Sanktionen gegen Anthropic aufrecht erhalten Open this report in The AI Times → Read it at Der Standard → What we have measured Actor named NATO is named as acting; it 'foiled' the manoeuvre ×1Actor named dead uncounted The US is named as the attacker and stated flat, but the dead schoolchildren are neither counted nor named ×1Actors left unnamed the three requesting states are counted, never named ×1Aim attributed and quoted the stated aim is in quotation marks and marked as the service's account ×1 from 7330 articles we hold · quote attached Outlet profile in The AI Times →

Claims and verdicts

true A federal appeals court in Washington upheld the Pentagon's designation of Anthropic as a supply-chain risk.
The Washington Examiner, the New York Times, UPI and Der Standard each report the court siding with the Pentagon. They differ only in what they call the designation: 'blacklisting', 'security risk' or 'sanctions'.
Checked against 4 sources:
Washington Examiner
Right estimate · not a score
Washington Examiner 🇺🇸US · newspaper · independent Federal appeals court upholds Pentagon’s supply-chain-risk designation of Anthropic Open this report in The AI Times → Read it at Washington Examiner → What we have measured Accusation printed unanswered a named candidate is accused of responsibility for murders, with no response carried ×1Accused named Names one accused student, citing the lawsuit; no other report we hold names any of the accused ×1Accused named Names each person charged and gives their nationality. None of the defendants is quoted. ×1Accused named Names one accused student from the civil filing and attributes the claim to the lawsuit ×1 from 3435 articles we hold · quote attached Outlet profile in The AI Times → The New York Times
Centre-left estimate · not a score
The New York Times 🇺🇸US · newspaper · independent Anthropic’s Blacklisting by the Pentagon Was Legal, Federal Judges Rule Open this report in The AI Times → Read it at The New York Times → What we have measured Active and passive voice the ship is 'targeted' with no actor, one sentence before a named actor is given for the Saudi attack ×1Active vs passive voice Pike is named as the killer in the active voice; the botched execution has no actor named ×1Actor label Names the shooter by its backer, not by its own name. ×1Actor named Names the official and what the process did to Pike. ×1 from 3862 articles we hold · quote attached Outlet profile in The AI Times → UPI
Centre estimate · not a score
UPI 🇺🇸US · wire · independent Appeals court sides with Pentagon on labeling Anthropic security risk Open this report in The AI Times → Read it at UPI → What we have measured Actor named in the body the court is the subject and three co-defendants are counted but unnamed ×1Administration named as acting The report states the ruling as the administration's power to designate and to bar, in the administration's own terms. ×1Asserted versus attributed states flat that nothing was revealed, while other reports carry Xi's stated positions ×1Completeness stated flat presents the withdrawal as a full end, with no mention of forces nearby ×1 from 2371 articles we hold · quote attached Outlet profile in The AI Times → Der Standard
Centre-left estimate · not a score
Der Standard 🇦🇹AT · newspaper · independent US-Justiz: Pentagon darf Sanktionen gegen Anthropic aufrecht erhalten Open this report in The AI Times → Read it at Der Standard → What we have measured Actor named NATO is named as acting; it 'foiled' the manoeuvre ×1Actor named dead uncounted The US is named as the attacker and stated flat, but the dead schoolchildren are neither counted nor named ×1Actors left unnamed the three requesting states are counted, never named ×1Aim attributed and quoted the stated aim is in quotation marks and marked as the service's account ×1 from 7330 articles we hold · quote attached Outlet profile in The AI Times →
unverified The court's decision was 2-1.
Only the Washington Examiner gives the split. The other three reports we hold do not mention a vote count.
Checked against 1 source:
Washington Examiner
Right estimate · not a score
Washington Examiner 🇺🇸US · newspaper · independent Federal appeals court upholds Pentagon’s supply-chain-risk designation of Anthropic Open this report in The AI Times → Read it at Washington Examiner → What we have measured Accusation printed unanswered a named candidate is accused of responsibility for murders, with no response carried ×1Accused named Names one accused student, citing the lawsuit; no other report we hold names any of the accused ×1Accused named Names each person charged and gives their nationality. None of the defendants is quoted. ×1Accused named Names one accused student from the civil filing and attributes the claim to the lawsuit ×1 from 3435 articles we hold · quote attached Outlet profile in The AI Times →
unverified The dispute began after Anthropic objected to military use of its products.
Only Der Standard gives this cause, and it dates the start of the dispute to February. The Washington Examiner dates the designation to March and gives no cause.
Checked against 2 sources:
Der Standard
Centre-left estimate · not a score
Der Standard 🇦🇹AT · newspaper · independent US-Justiz: Pentagon darf Sanktionen gegen Anthropic aufrecht erhalten Open this report in The AI Times → Read it at Der Standard → What we have measured Actor named NATO is named as acting; it 'foiled' the manoeuvre ×1Actor named dead uncounted The US is named as the attacker and stated flat, but the dead schoolchildren are neither counted nor named ×1Actors left unnamed the three requesting states are counted, never named ×1Aim attributed and quoted the stated aim is in quotation marks and marked as the service's account ×1 from 7330 articles we hold · quote attached Outlet profile in The AI Times → Washington Examiner
Right estimate · not a score
Washington Examiner 🇺🇸US · newspaper · independent Federal appeals court upholds Pentagon’s supply-chain-risk designation of Anthropic Open this report in The AI Times → Read it at Washington Examiner → What we have measured Accusation printed unanswered a named candidate is accused of responsibility for murders, with no response carried ×1Accused named Names one accused student, citing the lawsuit; no other report we hold names any of the accused ×1Accused named Names each person charged and gives their nationality. None of the defendants is quoted. ×1Accused named Names one accused student from the civil filing and attributes the claim to the lawsuit ×1 from 3435 articles we hold · quote attached Outlet profile in The AI Times →

Who wrote it

M Mike Brest Washington Examiner
What the bias passes found in their reporting
Conflict frame calls the legal dispute a 'feud'×1
Loaded term in own voice 'blacklisting' is the report's own word, placed beside the formal term used in its headline×1
Vote split given The only report that says the court was divided.×1
Word chosen for the measure The text calls it a 'blacklisting', while its own headline says 'designation'.×1
Claims we checked that rest on their reporting
2 unverified1 true
From 47 reports we hold under this byline, at Washington Examiner. Two independent readings, each made without the masthead, a quote attached to every tag. A record, never a rating. Their full record →
S Sheera Frenkel The New York Times
What the bias passes found in their reporting
Court's words quoted The report carries the court's reasoning in the court's own words. It gives no reply from the company.×1
Headline versus body the headline says 'blacklisting'; the body quotes the court's reasoning×1
Claims we checked that rest on their reporting
1 true
From 7 reports we hold under this byline, at The New York Times. Two independent readings, each made without the masthead, a quote attached to every tag. A record, never a rating. Their full record →
The bylines on the reports this story is built from. Hover one for what our passes have measured on their reporting. · 2 reports we hold carry no byline — we do not invent one.

Coverage, outlet by outlet

UPI
Centre estimate · not a score
UPI 🇺🇸US · wire · independent Appeals court sides with Pentagon on labeling Anthropic security risk Open this report in The AI Times → Read it at UPI → What we have measured Actor named in the body the court is the subject and three co-defendants are counted but unnamed ×1Administration named as acting The report states the ruling as the administration's power to designate and to bar, in the administration's own terms. ×1Asserted versus attributed states flat that nothing was revealed, while other reports carry Xi's stated positions ×1Completeness stated flat presents the withdrawal as a full end, with no mention of forces nearby ×1 from 2371 articles we hold · quote attached Outlet profile in The AI Times → — independent
The only report that uses the government's own framing: the administration can designate Anthropic a national security risk and bar it from Pentagon contracts.
The Trump administration can designate Anthropic a national security risk and bar it from Pentagon contracts, an federal appeals court ruled Friday.
Administration named as acting: The report states the ruling as the administration's power to designate and to bar, in the administration's own terms. — “The Trump administration can designate Anthropic a national security risk and bar it from Pentagon contracts”
Formal term: uses the legal designation and says what it bars — “The Trump administration can designate Anthropic a national security risk and bar it from Pentagon contracts”
Read it at UPI → https://www.upi.com/Top_News/US/2026/09/25/appeals-court-pentagon-anthr…
Der Standard
Centre-left estimate · not a score
Der Standard 🇦🇹AT · newspaper · independent US-Justiz: Pentagon darf Sanktionen gegen Anthropic aufrecht erhalten Open this report in The AI Times → Read it at Der Standard → What we have measured Actor named NATO is named as acting; it 'foiled' the manoeuvre ×1Actor named dead uncounted The US is named as the attacker and stated flat, but the dead schoolchildren are neither counted nor named ×1Actors left unnamed the three requesting states are counted, never named ×1Aim attributed and quoted the stated aim is in quotation marks and marked as the service's account ×1 from 7330 articles we hold · quote attached Outlet profile in The AI Times → — independent
The only report that says why the dispute began: in February, after Anthropic spoke out against military use. It says the court left the decision to the president and the defence secretary.
Künstliche Intelligenz US-Justiz: Pentagon darf Sanktionen gegen Anthropic aufrecht erhalten Entscheidung obliegt laut Richter dem Präsidenten sowie dem Verteidigungsminister. Streit hat im Februar begonnen, nachdem Anthropic sich gegen eine militärische Verwendung aussprach Anthropic wehrte sich gegen einen militärischen Einsatz ihrer KI-Modelle. Das Pentagon stufte Anthropic daraufhin Anfang März als "Sicherheitsrisiko in der Lieferkette" ein. REUTERS/Carlos Barria Washington – Im Konflikt mit dem US-Verteidigungsministerium um seine Einstufung als "Sicherheitsrisiko" hat das US-Unternehmen
Word chosen for the measure: 'Sanctions' is the strongest word any of the reports uses for the measure. — “Pentagon darf Sanktionen gegen Anthropic aufrecht erhalten”
Company's side given: The only report that says why the dispute began. It dates the start to February, where another report dates the listing to March. — “nachdem Anthropic sich gegen eine militärische Verwendung aussprach”
Loaded term: calls the designation 'sanctions' — “Pentagon darf Sanktionen gegen Anthropic aufrecht erhalten”
Cause given: the only report to say why the dispute began, and it states the reason flat — “nachdem Anthropic sich gegen eine militärische Verwendung aussprach”
Read it at Der Standard → https://www.derstandard.at/story/3000000341455/us-justiz-pentagon-darf-…
Washington Examiner
Right estimate · not a score
Washington Examiner 🇺🇸US · newspaper · independent Federal appeals court upholds Pentagon’s supply-chain-risk designation of Anthropic Open this report in The AI Times → Read it at Washington Examiner → What we have measured Accusation printed unanswered a named candidate is accused of responsibility for murders, with no response carried ×1Accused named Names one accused student, citing the lawsuit; no other report we hold names any of the accused ×1Accused named Names each person charged and gives their nationality. None of the defendants is quoted. ×1Accused named Names one accused student from the civil filing and attributes the claim to the lawsuit ×1 from 3435 articles we hold · quote attached Outlet profile in The AI Times → — independent
The only report that gives a 2-1 vote. It dates the Pentagon's listing to March and calls the case a "feud" with the "War Department".
A federal appeals court in the District of Columbia upheld the Pentagon’s effective blacklisting of Anthropic in a 2-1 decision on Friday. The ruling is the latest moment in the feud between the War Department, which listed Anthropic as a supply chain risk in March, and the artificial intelligence company that runs the Claude platform. Recommended Stories Zelensky claims Trump ‘made a final decision’ to provide Ukraine with Patriot missile license Navy creates robotic and drone warfighting development center at Joint Expeditionary Base Little Creek-Fort Story Pentagon identifies Virginia soldi
Word chosen for the measure: The text calls it a 'blacklisting', while its own headline says 'designation'. — “upheld the Pentagon’s effective blacklisting of Anthropic”
Vote split given: The only report that says the court was divided. — “in a 2-1 decision on Friday”
Loaded term in own voice: 'blacklisting' is the report's own word, placed beside the formal term used in its headline — “upheld the Pentagon’s effective blacklisting of Anthropic”
Conflict frame: calls the legal dispute a 'feud' — “the feud between the War Department”
Read it at Washington Examiner → https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/policy/defense/4743162/appeals-court…
The New York Times
Centre-left estimate · not a score
The New York Times 🇺🇸US · newspaper · independent Anthropic’s Blacklisting by the Pentagon Was Legal, Federal Judges Rule Open this report in The AI Times → Read it at The New York Times → What we have measured Active and passive voice the ship is 'targeted' with no actor, one sentence before a named actor is given for the Saudi attack ×1Active vs passive voice Pike is named as the killer in the active voice; the botched execution has no actor named ×1Actor label Names the shooter by its backer, not by its own name. ×1Actor named Names the official and what the process did to Pike. ×1 from 3862 articles we hold · quote attached Outlet profile in The AI Times → — independent
The only report that quotes the court: the Pentagon had "ample support for its conclusion" that the company's products could pose a national security risk.
The Pentagon had “ample support for its conclusion” that the A.I. company’s products could pose a national security risk, according to a Washington appeals court.
Court's words quoted: The report carries the court's reasoning in the court's own words. It gives no reply from the company. — “ample support for its conclusion”
Headline versus body: the headline says 'blacklisting'; the body quotes the court's reasoning — “The Pentagon had “ample support for its conclusion””
Read it at The New York Times → https://www.nytimes.com/2026/09/25/technology/anthropic-trump-ruling.ht…

Sign in to The AI Times

Everything is free while we are building it. Signing in is how comments, likes and your reading stay yours.

Continue with Google

Sign-in is coming soon.

By continuing you agree to be a reader of a paper that shows its working.
×