Goolsbee: high inflation for so long is 'playing with fire'; Williams sees 'no urgency' for the next Fed hike
Two Federal Reserve officials pulled in different directions on 29 September, as rate rises resumed and bond yields climbed. The only record we hold of what either said is a Reuters headline.
The split. Chicago Fed president Austan Goolsbee said keeping inflation high for so long is "playing with fire", according to Reuters headlines in Spanish and Portuguese. New York Fed president John Williams "sees no urgency" for the Fed's next rate hike, according to a Reuters headline in Spanish.
| Official | What the headline says | Measure named? |
|---|---|---|
| Goolsbee (Chicago) | high inflation for so long is "playing with fire" | No |
| Williams (New York) | no urgency for the next hike | No |
Who pays. Higher rates make borrowing cost more. The Guardian carries an Associated Press report that cites the research firm Renaissance Capital. It says the Fed's "resumption of rate hikes" and a surge in bond yields were among the reasons share listings tailed off in the third quarter. The smart ring maker Oura postponed its listing the same day, citing market "uncertainty". Reuters reported the S&P 500 steady as bond yields rose.
Who is missing. Both reports that run past a headline are written for investors. No report we hold says what the next hike would mean for mortgages, credit cards or wages.
What is not settled. For both officials, we hold nothing beyond the headlines. We do not know which inflation measure or period Goolsbee meant. We do not know whether he argued for a hike now, or what Williams said about the path after that. Each official's words rest on Reuters alone.
What this is about. Two senior officials at America's central bank disagree on how fast to raise interest rates again.
How it got here. The Federal Reserve sets the short-term interest rate that feeds through to mortgages, car loans, credit cards and business borrowing. Congress gave it two goals: stable prices and maximum employment. Prices surged in 2021 as the economy reopened after the pandemic. The Fed raised rates rapidly through 2022 and 2023, then began cutting in late 2024 as inflation eased. The Associated Press report carried by The Guardian says the Fed has now resumed raising rates. We hold no report saying when that began or by how much.
Who the actors are. Rates are set by the Federal Open Market Committee. Its voting members are the seven governors in Washington, the president of the New York Fed, and four of the other eleven regional bank presidents, who take turns. Austan Goolsbee has led the Chicago Fed since 2023. He chaired Barack Obama's Council of Economic Advisers. John Williams has led the New York Fed since 2018. He is the committee's vice chair and always has a vote. Regional presidents speak in public between meetings, and markets read what they say as signals.
What is at stake. If the Fed waits, price rises may settle in, and that falls hardest on households whose wages lag. If it moves fast, borrowing costs rise for households and firms, and jobs can be lost. Bond yields are the interest governments and companies pay to borrow. They tend to move before the Fed does.
Where it stands. On 29 September yields were rising. The Guardian's report tied a slowdown in share listings partly to higher rates. The two officials' public words pointed in different directions.
What is being argued about
- Goolsbee's warning that keeping inflation high for so long is 'playing with fire'
- Williams seeing no urgency for the Fed's next rate hike
- Higher rates and bond yields cited as one reason share listings dried up
- What the resumed hikes cost borrowers, which no report we hold says
Claims and verdicts
No claims registered.
Who wrote it
Coverage, outlet by outlet
Reuters
Reuters
🇺🇸US ·
wire · independent
Reuters
Reuters
🇺🇸US ·
wire · independent
Reuters
Reuters
🇺🇸US ·
wire · independent
Reuters
Reuters
🇺🇸US ·
wire · independent
The Guardian
The Guardian
🇬🇧UK ·
newspaper · independent
Smart ring maker Oura puts off initial public offering due to market ‘uncertainty’
Open this report in The AI Times →
Read it at The Guardian →
What we have measured
Actor named Denial in the passive voice, with no one named as the person who dismissed it ×1Actor named names Israel as acting and states the death toll flat, with no source ×1Actor named Ireland named as the side that ended the conference ×1Allegation omitted the police statement is cut with an ellipsis where the other two reports carry the controlling or coercive behaviour allegation ×1
Outlet profile in The AI Times →
— independent