Guardian counts 'hundreds of thousands' hit and presses ministers' questions; Independent counts 'thousands of flights' and leads on the Nats apology
National Air Traffic Services blames a software defect for last week's UK air traffic failure. Two outlets agree on the cause. They measure the damage differently and give the floor to different people.
The cause. The Guardian and The Independent both report that National Air Traffic Services (Nats) blames a software defect. That is Nats' own account. Neither report we hold says anyone has checked it independently.
Where they part.
| The Guardian | The Independent | |
|---|---|---|
| Scale | "hundreds of thousands" of people | "thousands of flights" |
| Length | six-hour outage | not given |
| Timings | error at 10am, major incident declared 12.30pm | not given |
| Voice | ministers: questions unanswered | Nats chief Martin Rolfe: "At no point was safety in question" |
The two scale figures count different things: people and flights. They do not contradict each other.
The gap. The Guardian cites the Nats report. It says the error first occurred at 10am but a major incident was not declared until 12.30pm. Ministers say they need "to urgently understand why this issue was not discovered and fixed before it caused chaos".
The apology. The Independent says Rolfe apologised for the defect. The part of its report we could read does not quote ministers.
What is not settled. - Why the defect was not found before it failed. Ministers say they do not know. - The exact number of passengers and flights. Neither report gives one. - The timings and the six-hour length come from The Guardian alone. - A second Independent report, a news bulletin, reached us as a headline only. We could not read how it framed the story.
What this is about. A computer fault at the body that guides aircraft through UK airspace stopped flights across the country last week. The body's own report on why has now been published.
How it got here. National Air Traffic Services, known as Nats, was separated from the Civil Aviation Authority and part-privatised in 2001. Since then it has been run as a public-private partnership. The government keeps a stake, and airlines and other shareholders hold the rest. Nats handles aircraft flying over the UK and runs the control towers at many of its airports. When its systems cannot process flight plans, controllers have to accept fewer aircraft. Flights are then held on the ground or cancelled.
The Guardian says that is what happened last week. It reports a six-hour outage and mass cancellations and delays. Nats has now published its report. The report blames a software defect that corrupted flight data "in the space of a millisecond".
Who is involved. - Nats runs the system and wrote the report. Its chief executive is Martin Rolfe. - Ministers answer for the government's stake and for transport policy. They say the report leaves questions open. - The Civil Aviation Authority is the UK's independent aviation regulator. It regulates Nats. - Airlines and passengers bore the cancellations and delays.
What is at stake. Whether one software fault can halt UK air travel again. If ministers decide the defect should have been caught, pressure will grow on how Nats tests its systems and how quickly it declares a failure. If the report satisfies them, the outage will be treated as a rare fault.
Where it stands. Nats has published its report and apologised. Ministers say they still need to understand why the fault was not found earlier. The reports we hold do not say what happens next.
What is being argued about
- A software defect named by Nats as the cause
- Two and a half hours between the first error and a major incident, according to The Guardian
- Ministers' questions set against the Nats chief's apology
- People affected or flights grounded
Claims and verdicts
No claims registered.
Who wrote it
The Independent
The Guardian
The Independent
Coverage, outlet by outlet
The Independent
The Independent
🇬🇧UK ·
digital · independent
The Guardian
The Guardian
🇬🇧UK ·
newspaper · independent
Flight chaos for hundreds of thousands was caused in ‘millisecond’ by software error
Open this report in The AI Times →
Read it at The Guardian →
What we have measured
Actor named Denial in the passive voice, with no one named as the person who dismissed it ×1Actor named names Israel as acting and states the death toll flat, with no source ×1Actor named Ireland named as the side that ended the conference ×1Allegation omitted the police statement is cut with an ellipsis where the other two reports carry the controlling or coercive behaviour allegation ×1
Outlet profile in The AI Times →
— independent
The Independent
The Independent
🇬🇧UK ·
digital · independent
ABC News (Australia)
ABC News (Australia)
🇦🇺AU ·
public broadcaster · public-service
What we have measured
Actor label and hedge The same man is called 'far-right' and named by his legal name. The act is hedged with 'allegedly', where the longer report states it flat. ×1A different count, stated flat one dead and 140 missing, unattributed, earliest of the four ×1Affected counted The only report to count the local people affected ×1Are the dead named one of the dead named, through a relative at the hospital ×1
Outlet profile in The AI Times →
C
CBC News
BBC News
BBC News
🇬🇧UK ·
public broadcaster · public-service
What we have measured
Dating and attribution 'It was not until Tuesday' is a judgement about delay, not a date. No other report we hold comments on how long the German finding took. ×1How hard the claim is stated Headline says the UN voted to adopt and replace; the last sentence of the report says the vote is non-binding ×1How hard the claim is stated The qualification arrives in the last sentence and is immediately overridden by an effect the report gives no source for. ×1Which figure is used States the replacement as done — the Assembly voted to replace the map — where the resolution urges states to use a different projection. ×1
Outlet profile in The AI Times →
The Daily Telegraph
The Daily Telegraph
🇬🇧UK ·
newspaper · independent
What we have measured
Outlet profile in The AI Times →
The Times
The Times
🇬🇧UK ·
newspaper · independent
What we have measured
Outlet profile in The AI Times →