Kan has Eisenkot on 24 and Likud on 20; Channel 14 has Likud first on 30
The Jerusalem Post reports five Israeli polls published in one night. Four put Gadi Eisenkot's Yashar ahead of Likud; the fifth puts Likud nine seats clear of it. That report is the only one we hold that carries a seat figure at all.
One report, five polls. The Jerusalem Post is the only report we hold that carries any seat figures. It describes five surveys published on Wednesday night. Four put Gadi Eisenkot's Yashar ahead of Likud. The fifth, Channel 14, puts Likud first on 30 — twelve more than the lowest figure any of the others gives it.
| Poll | Yashar | Likud | Netanyahu bloc | Bloc opposed to Netanyahu |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kan | 24 | 20 | 52 | 52 |
| Channel 13 | 22 | 18 | 54 | 52 |
| Channel 12 | 23 | 20 | 50 | 66 |
| Channel 14 | 21 | 30 | 64 | — |
| Channel 16 | 21 | 18 | 52 | 53 |
Not all of them are deadlocked. The Post's own arithmetic gives the right-wing bloc 64 seats in the Channel 14 poll, and the bloc opposed to Netanyahu 66 in the Channel 12 poll. Only the Kan, Channel 13 and Channel 16 figures leave both sides short of the 61 the report itself names as the threshold for forming a government. The Channel 12 total counts 12 Arab-party seats, which the report adds on a separate line from what it calls Zionist parties.
What is not settled. No report gives a sample size, a field date or a margin of error for any of the five polls, and no second report carries a number to set against the Post's. The Post writes that Ofer Winter's People of Israel "has established itself above the electoral threshold", but gives it a figure — four seats — in only two of the five surveys. No Arab party representative is quoted in any of the six reports we hold.
This is a story about an Israeli election campaign in which the published polling does not agree on who is winning.
Israel elects its parliament, the Knesset, by nationwide proportional representation: 120 seats, a threshold below which a party wins nothing, and a government that needs the confidence of 61 members. No single party has ever won 61 alone, so Israeli elections are decided by blocs rather than by parties, and the question of who will sit with whom settles the result more often than the seat counts do. Israelis vote again next month.
Benjamin Netanyahu has led Likud since 2005 and has been prime minister for most of the years since 2009. Since 2019 Israeli politics has cycled through repeated elections, each one turning on whether a majority can be assembled for him or against him. His outgoing coalition included Bezalel Smotrich's Religious Zionist Party and Itamar Ben-Gvir's Otzma Yehudit, both on the far right. Against him stands a bloc with no single leader: Gadi Eisenkot, a former army chief of staff, leads a new party, Yashar; Naftali Bennett, prime minister in 2021-22, leads another; Avigdor Liberman's Yisrael Beytenu is a third.
Two arguments run underneath the numbers. One is 7 October 2023 and the war in Gaza that followed — Eisenkot told Kan Public Radio that the Shin Bet and Military Intelligence investigations into that day "will send shockwaves". The other is whether ultra-Orthodox men should be conscripted, a dispute that has broken Israeli coalitions before and that one candidate is now using against another.
And there is the arithmetic. The Arab parties — Hadash-Ta'al-Balad and Ra'am — hold seats the bloc opposed to Netanyahu cannot reach 61 without, and whether to rely on them is exactly what Liberman is pressing Eisenkot to answer in public. That is where the campaign stands today: a fortnight of polls that disagree, and a question about partners that nobody has answered.
What is being argued about
- Five Israeli polls published in one night, and the one that points the other way
- Whether either bloc is anywhere near a majority
- Arab-party seats counted on a separate line from the bloc they would join
- What none of the polls publish: sample sizes, field dates, margins of error
Claims and verdicts
The Jerusalem Post
The Jerusalem Post
🇮🇱IL ·
newspaper · independent
The Jerusalem Post
The Jerusalem Post
🇮🇱IL ·
newspaper · independent
The Jerusalem Post
The Jerusalem Post
🇮🇱IL ·
newspaper · independent
Who wrote it
Ynet
Haaretz
Haaretz
Haaretz
Coverage, outlet by outlet
The Jerusalem Post
The Jerusalem Post
🇮🇱IL ·
newspaper · independent
Ynet
Ynet
🇮🇱IL ·
digital · independent
טרופר בריאיון ראשון: "וינטר בחר בצד של ההשתמטות ונתניהו"
Open this report in The AI Times →
Read it at Ynet →
What we have measured
A claim in the headline that the other reports very close to deciding the regime appears in one report only ×1Active voice The killers are the subject of the verbs 'beat' and 'burned'. ×1Active voice The killers are named as acting ×1Army's term, attributed the army names the target of its strikes, and no one on the other side is quoted ×1
Outlet profile in The AI Times →
— independent
Yisrael Beytenu hits back at Eisenkot: Who are your partners?
Open this report in The AI Times →
Read it at Arutz Sheva →
What we have measured
A caveat kept in the only report we hold that says the rejection was of a promo, not the finished film ×1A different word, and a hedge Calls the same event an airstrike rather than a controlled demolition, and marks it "Reported" while offering footage as its evidence. ×1An allegation stated as established the headline presents the plan as fact and as a disclosure, with no attribution to the charge sheet ×1Asserted flat Calls it a 'terror network' and says Iran helped build it, in its own voice, with no source. ×1
Outlet profile in The AI Times →
—
Haaretz
Haaretz
🇮🇱IL ·
newspaper · independent
Haaretz
Haaretz
🇮🇱IL ·
newspaper · independent
Haaretz
Haaretz
🇮🇱IL ·
newspaper · independent
Palestine TV · Palestinian Broadcasting Corporation
Palestine TV · Palestinian Broadcasting Corporation
🇵🇸PS ·
TV/radio · state-controlled
What we have measured
Asserted versus attributed recognition itself stated as fact ×1Attribution 'historic' attributed to the Palestinian ambassador ×1Dead counted, not named two dead are counted as 'citizens' and none are named; the wounded are not counted ×1Dead named Gives the dead man's full name and age. ×1
Outlet profile in The AI Times →
Shargh
Shargh
🇮🇷IR ·
newspaper · independent
What we have measured
A count with its base both days given, and the data called preliminary ×1Actor named as a state the attack is Yemen's, not the Houthis' ×1A different actor does the asking Pakistan's army chief, not Beijing, is the one asking Tehran to use its influence, on the word of unnamed Pakistani government sources. ×1'aggression' in the narration The US campaign is called aggression in the report's own narration, which it credits to Al-Ahram's account of the call. ×1
Outlet profile in The AI Times →
Al-Monitor
Al-Monitor
🇺🇸US/ME ·
digital · independent
What we have measured
Actor from anonymous officials Puts the IRGC at the trigger in a sentence sourc ×1Actor named Names the Director-General as the one who requested the dismissal ×1Actor named names Trump as the one who began the war, with Israel ×1Actor named names Israel as the actor in its military actions against the Palestinians ×1
Outlet profile in The AI Times →
Tehran Times
Tehran Times
🇮🇷IR ·
newspaper · state-controlled
What we have measured
Asserted vs attributed headline states the seizure flat; the body attributes it to the claimant ×1Attribution the toll is attributed to a body that is described but not named ×1Headline against body headline states the seizure flat; the body attributes it to the IRGC ×1How the objectors are framed opposition is described as protesters speaking for civilians ×1
Outlet profile in The AI Times →
Al Jazeera English
Al Jazeera English
🇶🇦QA ·
TV/radio · state-funded international
What we have measured
Accusation attributed Cuba's charge is attributed to its foreign minister, not stated as fact ×1Actor named The headline names Israel as the actor and gives a count of three that includes a child. ×1Agency No actor is named for the detentions. The raids, not the soldiers, 'left' the town in lockdown ×1Agency Names Israel as the actor in the headline, in active voice ×1
Outlet profile in The AI Times →
LBCI (Lebanese Broadcasting Corporation International)
LBCI (Lebanese Broadcasting Corporation International)
🇱🇧LB ·
TV/radio · independent
What we have measured
Active voice, actor named the Israeli army carried out the detonation ×1Actor framing Tehran calls the meeting. Iraq is the only other state named. ×1Actor left unnamed the strike in Iraqi waters has no one named as firing it — the source is "unknown" ×1Actor named names Israel as the one striking ×1
Outlet profile in The AI Times →
The Times of Israel
The Times of Israel
🇮🇱IL ·
digital · independent
What we have measured
Actorless in own voice The killing is passive with no shooter in the se ×1Headline carries the purpose The livestock and the army's reason are in the h ×1Headline frame The headline carries the military's word for the ×1Military words carried whole Both the label for the dead and the phrase for t ×1
Outlet profile in The AI Times →
A
Al-Sabaah
Ma'an News Agency
Ma'an News Agency
🇵🇸PS ·
digital · independent
What we have measured
Outlet profile in The AI Times →
Al-Mada
Al-Mada
🇮🇶IQ ·
newspaper · independent
What we have measured
Outlet profile in The AI Times →
North Press Agency
North Press Agency
🇸🇾SY ·
wire · independent
What we have measured
Attribution the damage list is carried in full, attributed to the side claiming it ×1Single official source Uses the Saudi Press Agency's account: 'bilateral relations', with no mention of reconstruction or money. ×1What is at stake presents the stakes as trade and energy security; no ship, crew or price is counted ×1Which line is led with led by the legal instrument, naming the Security Council resolution by number ×1
Outlet profile in The AI Times →
WAFA · Palestinian News & Information Agency
WAFA · Palestinian News & Information Agency
🇵🇸PS ·
state agency · state-controlled
What we have measured
Outlet profile in The AI Times →
Al-Manar
Al-Manar
🇱🇧LB ·
TV/radio · independent
What we have measured
Outlet profile in The AI Times →
Middle East Eye
Middle East Eye
🇬🇧UK ·
digital · independent
What we have measured
How hard the claim is stated Its own body says the investigators did not attribute the network to the Emirati state — the qualification its headline drops. ×1How hard the claim is stated The body withdraws in one line the attribution its own headline makes ×1How deeply it is sourced Cites its own past reporting as the evidence for the claim in its own headline, and calls the evidence widespread in its own voice ×1How deeply it is sourced Offers its own past reporting as the evidence supporting the claim in its headline, inside the same sentence that carries the denial. ×1
Outlet profile in The AI Times →
Ammon News
Ammon News
🇯🇴JO ·
digital · independent
What we have measured
Outlet profile in The AI Times →