The Independent calls a 9/11 widow's Saudi demand a 'rant'; the Washington Examiner calls it a 'call for justice'
At ground zero, Terry Strada told Vice-President JD Vance that US administrations "chose to protect the Saudis". Two outlets used three words for the same speech.
What happened. At the ground zero memorial on 11 September, Terry Strada, whose husband Tom died in the World Trade Center, asked Vice-President JD Vance to press President Trump to hold Saudi Arabia to account. Both outlets report that families applauded.
Three words for one speech. We hold three reports from two outlets. The two from the Independent do not confirm each other.
| Outlet | Headline word | Names Strada? | Her words carried |
|---|---|---|---|
| The Independent | "rant" that "takes over" | In the lede | One sentence |
| The Independent | "interrupts" | No | None |
| Washington Examiner | "calls for justice" | Yes | At length |
What she said. Strada says administrations, "including leaders in front of us here today", "chose to protect the Saudis", "withheld evidence" and "vetoed" the Justice Against Sponsors of Terrorism Act, the Washington Examiner reports.
The Saudi side. Saudi Arabia denies involvement, the Washington Examiner reports, in one clause. None of the three reports quotes a Saudi official.
What is not settled. - Only the Washington Examiner reports an August ruling by Judge George Daniels that let the families' lawsuit go ahead. No other report we hold mentions it. - Strada says the families "have proved" Saudi involvement. The ruling, as the Examiner describes it, found "reasonable evidence" and let the case go ahead. It did not decide the case. - From the Independent we hold only headlines and one line of text. We cannot say how its full stories framed her.
What this is about. Families of people killed in the attacks of 11 September 2001 are suing Saudi Arabia in an American court, and at this year's memorial at ground zero one of them asked the US vice-president to put the White House behind them.
How it got here. Hijackers flew passenger aircraft into the World Trade Center in New York and the Pentagon outside Washington on 11 September 2001. The attacks were carried out by al Qaeda, the Washington Examiner reports. Relatives of the dead have pressed two demands ever since: release of the government's unredacted files on the hijackers, and the right to sue the kingdom itself. That right did not exist. The Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act of 1976 shields foreign governments from most American lawsuits. Congress carved out an exception in 2016 with the Justice Against Sponsors of Terrorism Act, which lets US citizens sue a foreign state over an act of terrorism on American soil; it became law after Congress overrode President Obama's veto. The families' claims were consolidated before the federal court in Manhattan, where Saudi Arabia has fought to have them dismissed. In August, Judge George Daniels refused and let the case go ahead, the Washington Examiner reports.
Who is in it. Terry Strada is the widow of Tom Strada and chairs the campaign group 9/11 Families United. JD Vance is the US vice-president and attended the New York ceremony; President Trump was at the Pentagon service the same morning. Saudi Arabia, a long-standing US security and energy partner, denies involvement.
What is at stake. If the case proceeds, an American court would weigh a foreign government's conduct and could order it to pay damages. If it is thrown out, the families' 25-year legal route closes.
Where it stands. The lawsuit is alive but undecided. None of the reports we hold says what the court does next, or whether the White House answered Strada.
What is being argued about
- Whether US administrations shielded Saudi Arabia from the 9/11 families
- The families' lawsuit against Saudi Arabia in a New York federal court
- How outlets named a widow's speech: rant, interruption or call for justice
- Saudi Arabia's denial, carried in one clause in one report
Claims and verdicts
No claims registered.
Who wrote it
The Independent · 2 reports on this story
Washington Examiner
Coverage, outlet by outlet
The Independent
The Independent
🇬🇧UK ·
digital · independent
Anti-Saudi Arabia rant on stage takes over reading of 9/11 victims names and draws applause from families
Open this report in The AI Times →
Read it at The Independent →
What we have measured
Accused party response Russia's side is reported as no comment. ×1A company statement about itself, taken as a "reveals" rather than "says", for a company's account of its own product ×1A count stated flat four crimes is given as a settled number in the headline, with no court, charge or jurisdiction attached ×1Actor named No actor named for the cut-short or for the clashes ×1
Outlet profile in The AI Times →
— independent
Washington Examiner
Washington Examiner
🇺🇸US ·
newspaper · independent
The Independent
The Independent
🇬🇧UK ·
digital · independent
International Court of Justice
International Court of Justice
INT ·
official record · intergovernmental body
What we have measured
Outlet profile in The AI Times →
International Criminal Court
International Criminal Court
INT ·
official record · intergovernmental body
What we have measured
Outlet profile in The AI Times →
UN News
UN News
INT ·
official record · intergovernmental body
What we have measured
Actors named Names both vetoing states and the sponsor, and says what the draft would have created ×1Asserted versus attributed share of women and children among the dead given with no source ×1Asserted vs attributed Israel named as acting, stated in the report's own voice ×1Asymmetric verb The Iranian government's crimes are 'confirmed'. The US finding is only 'reasonable grounds'. The two findings are weighted differently in one sentence. ×1
Outlet profile in The AI Times →