MSNBC says Trump and Hegseth used 9/11 'to defend Iran war'; the Examiner's full text leads on 'We were all New Yorkers'
Trump gave one sentence of his Pentagon 9/11 speech to the troops fighting Iran. Two outlets put Iran in the headline. The outlet that printed the whole speech did not. Two outlets also give different death tolls for the Pentagon.
What was said. At the Pentagon on the 25th anniversary of the attacks, Trump saluted "the service members working right now to ensure the world's No. 1 sponsor of terror, the Islamic Republic of Iran, will never, ever, have a nuclear weapon." The Washington Examiner prints the line in its full transcript. The Hill quotes it.
How three outlets framed it.
| Outlet | Frame | Iran in headline? |
|---|---|---|
| MSNBC | speeches used "to defend Iran war" | yes |
| The Hill | "tie Iran war to 9/11", "a continuation of the war on terror" | yes |
| Washington Examiner | "READ IN FULL"; opens on "We were all New Yorkers" | no |
Hegseth. MSNBC and The Hill say Pete Hegseth also tied the war to 9/11. Neither quotes him, and we hold no text of his speech. The Hill and MSNBC call him defense secretary. The Examiner calls him war secretary.
The Pentagon dead. The Examiner says the names of "all 186 people who died at the Pentagon" were read. The Hill says 184 died there. Neither says who its figure includes.
What is not settled. - What Hegseth said, in his own words. - Whether 184 and 186 count the same people. Either figure could include or leave out the passengers of Flight 77. Neither report says. - How MSNBC argues its case. We could read only its one-line summary, which says the two men "touted U.S. action in Iran".
What this is about. A president used a memorial for the dead of 2001 to speak about a war with Iran being fought now, and the outlets that covered him disagreed about which of those was the news.
How it got here. On 11 September 2001, hijackers from al-Qaeda flew airliners into the World Trade Center in New York and into the Pentagon, the headquarters of the US military in Arlington, Virginia; a fourth aircraft came down in a field near Shanksville, Pennsylvania. Trump's speech puts the toll at 2,977 dead and says American Airlines Flight 77 struck the Pentagon at 9:37 a.m. Congress authorised the use of military force within days. The United States invaded Afghanistan in 2001 and Iraq in 2003, and successive presidents called that long campaign the war on terror — the phrase Trump uses at the Pentagon.
Iran has been the Islamic Republic since the revolution of 1979. Washington has designated it a state sponsor of terrorism since 1984. Its nuclear programme has been disputed for two decades: a 2015 agreement capped uranium enrichment in exchange for sanctions relief, and Trump withdrew the United States from it in 2018. Iran has consistently said the programme is not for weapons. That is the quarrel Trump's one sentence at the Pentagon reaches for.
What we do not hold. The reports describe an ongoing Iran war with US service members in it. None of them says when it started, who struck first, where it is being fought, or what it has cost. We hold no report on any of that.
Who is here. Trump, as president. Pete Hegseth, who runs the Pentagon — the reports do not agree on his title. Gen. Dan Caine, chairman of the Joint Chiefs. Condoleezza Rice, who was in George W. Bush's White House in 2001. No Iranian voice appears in any report we hold.
What is at stake. If this war is a continuation of the answer to 9/11, it inherits that answer's authority and its public memory. If it is a separate war, it needs its own case. That is the argument under the headlines.
What is being argued about
- Whether the Pentagon speeches were a remembrance or a case for the Iran war
- The one Iran line in Trump's speech
- What Hegseth said, which no report we hold quotes
- 184 or 186 dead at the Pentagon
Claims and verdicts
Washington Examiner
Washington Examiner
🇺🇸US ·
newspaper · independent
The Hill
The Hill
🇺🇸US ·
digital · independent
MSNBC
MSNBC
🇺🇸US ·
TV/radio · independent
Trump, Hegseth use 9/11 memorial speeches to defend Iran war
Open this report in The AI Times →
Read it at MSNBC →
What we have measured
Accuser not named The lede does not name the senator making the accusation ×1Actor named for the ban The White House is the subject of both verbs: it blocked journalists, then let CNN back in. ×1A first stated flat a never-before claim carried without a source attached ×1Asserted, not attributed absence of fraud evidence stated as fact ×1
Outlet profile in The AI Times →
The Hill
The Hill
🇺🇸US ·
digital · independent
MSNBC
MSNBC
🇺🇸US ·
TV/radio · independent
Trump, Hegseth use 9/11 memorial speeches to defend Iran war
Open this report in The AI Times →
Read it at MSNBC →
What we have measured
Accuser not named The lede does not name the senator making the accusation ×1Actor named for the ban The White House is the subject of both verbs: it blocked journalists, then let CNN back in. ×1A first stated flat a never-before claim carried without a source attached ×1Asserted, not attributed absence of fraud evidence stated as fact ×1
Outlet profile in The AI Times →
The Hill
The Hill
🇺🇸US ·
digital · independent
Washington Examiner
Washington Examiner
🇺🇸US ·
newspaper · independent
Who wrote it
MSNBC
The Hill
Washington Examiner
Coverage, outlet by outlet
MSNBC
MSNBC
🇺🇸US ·
TV/radio · independent
Trump, Hegseth use 9/11 memorial speeches to defend Iran war
Open this report in The AI Times →
Read it at MSNBC →
What we have measured
Accuser not named The lede does not name the senator making the accusation ×1Actor named for the ban The White House is the subject of both verbs: it blocked journalists, then let CNN back in. ×1A first stated flat a never-before claim carried without a source attached ×1Asserted, not attributed absence of fraud evidence stated as fact ×1
Outlet profile in The AI Times →
— independent
The Hill
The Hill
🇺🇸US ·
digital · independent
Washington Examiner
Washington Examiner
🇺🇸US ·
newspaper · independent
The Hill
The Hill
🇺🇸US ·
digital · independent
The Hill
The Hill
🇺🇸US ·
digital · independent
Mother Jones
Mother Jones
🇺🇸US ·
magazine · independent
What we have measured
Asserted, not attributed 'ultra-gerrymandered' stated as fact ×1Asserted versus attributed 'Cover-up' is asserted in the report's own voice, not attributed ×1Asserted versus attributed calls it a cover-up in its own voice ×1Assertion vs attribution describes the operation as a 'violent occupation' in its own voice, with no source for the phrase ×1
Outlet profile in The AI Times →
Reuters
Reuters
🇺🇸US ·
wire · independent
What we have measured
Actor named The attacker is the subject of an active verb for both the deaths and the damage ×1Actor named No actor named for who cancelled the flights ×1Agreement stated flat, source in a tail attribution moved after the dash ×1Announcement written as settled A social-media post becomes a future indicative: the conversion will happen ×1
Outlet profile in The AI Times →
N
NPR
Fox News
Fox News
🇺🇸US ·
TV/radio · independent
What we have measured
Accused named Names one former fraternity member through his lawyer's denial. The woman is anonymous by her own choice. ×1Actor in headline The headline names Trump as the one acting. The body names only Anduril. ×1A number, with no people named The only report that gives a figure counts the journalists whose communications were swept up. It names none of them. ×1Asserted, not attributed stated flat: past court defeats are asserted with no case, judge or date named ×1
Outlet profile in The AI Times →
Breitbart
Breitbart
🇺🇸US ·
digital · independent
What we have measured
Anyone hurt is counted, not named eight deaths given as a number only ×1Framing of motive The lede calls the denial a punishment and puts 'fake news' in quotation marks; the officials being sued are left unnamed ×1How the person shot is named a status, not a name: the only report that never uses either name calls him an illegal alien ×1How the place is described a party label attached to the city in the same clause as the casualty count ×1
Outlet profile in The AI Times →
The New York Times
The New York Times
🇺🇸US ·
newspaper · independent
What we have measured
Active and passive voice the ship is 'targeted' with no actor, one sentence before a named actor is given for the Saudi attack ×1Active vs passive voice Pike is named as the killer in the active voice; the botched execution has no actor named ×1Actor label Names the shooter by its backer, not by its own name. ×1Actor named Names the official and what the process did to Pike. ×1
Outlet profile in The AI Times →
National Review
National Review
🇺🇸US ·
magazine · independent
What we have measured
Asserted not attributed Doubt about the allegation is stated flat, in the outlet's own voice ×1Asserted not attributed An argument about deterrence is stated as fact ×1Asserted versus attributed calls it an abuse of power in its own voice ×1Asserted versus attributed 'Abuse of presidential power' is stated flat ×1
Outlet profile in The AI Times →
The Wall Street Journal
The Wall Street Journal
🇺🇸US ·
newspaper · independent
What we have measured
Outlet profile in The AI Times →