Sheeran says the promoter dropped Macklemore, Macklemore says Kraft did; The Intercept says Kraft's charity funds Friends of the IDF
Macklemore was taken off the US dates of Ed Sheeran's Loop tour after he said "free Palestine" onstage at MetLife Stadium. Five US reports give three accounts of who made the call. They also give two opposite accounts of where the Patriots owner's money goes.
Who dropped him. Four of the five reports cover the removal. They give three answers.
| Source | Who removed him |
|---|---|
| Washington Examiner, in its own voice | "a promoter's decision" |
| Ed Sheeran, quoted by the Examiner | "the promoter's decision, it was not mine"; "the venue's and promoter's decision was final" |
| Macklemore, quoted by the Examiner | Robert Kraft, who he says "rallied some of the other stadium owners" to give Sheeran "an ultimatum" |
| Fox News | his "messaging got him removed". No one is named as acting |
| CNBC | he "was removed... for making pro-Palestine comments". No one is named as acting |
Where Kraft's money goes. Kraft's statement, as the Examiner quotes it, says he has "for decades" supported "efforts that create opportunity for Palestinians". He says Sheeran asked him to commit $2 million to aid in the region. Breitbart says Kraft "pledged millions". The Intercept says tax forms show that Kraft's charity and his LLC gave to Friends of the IDF and to AIPAC's super PAC. Our copy of that report is a summary. It gives no amounts and no years.
Labels. CNBC calls it "pro-Palestine comments". Breitbart calls Ms Rachel "anti-Israel". The Examiner's columnist calls it "an Ivy League campus protest".
What is not settled - Whether there was an ultimatum. The only source is Macklemore's second-hand account. - Who the promoter is. None of the five reports names it. - How much Kraft's charity gave, and when. None of the text we hold gives the figures. - Whether Kraft committed the $2 million or was only asked to.
What this is about. A rapper was taken off a stadium tour after he said "free Palestine" onstage. He blames the owner of one of the stadiums.
How it got here. On 7 October 2023, Hamas-led fighters attacked southern Israel. Israel answered with a war in Gaza. The war has divided opinion in the United States. In spring 2024, protest camps spread across US university campuses, and "free Palestine" became their slogan. Macklemore is a rapper from Seattle. He backed those protests and released a song about Gaza that year. Ed Sheeran, a British singer, took him on the US leg of his Loop tour as an opening act. Macklemore said "free Palestine" onstage at MetLife Stadium in New Jersey. He was then taken off the remaining US dates, and he announced this on Instagram on Monday 14 September.
Who is involved - Macklemore: the performer who was removed. - Ed Sheeran: the headliner. He says Macklemore's contract was with the promoter, not with him. - The promoter: holds the tour contracts. None of our reports names it. - Robert Kraft: owner of the New England Patriots. His Kraft Group owns Gillette Stadium, where the tour was due to play later this month. In 2019 he founded a foundation to combat antisemitism. - Friends of the IDF: a US charity that raises money for Israel's soldiers. - AIPAC: the main pro-Israel lobby in Washington. It runs a super PAC that spends money in US elections.
What is at stake. Stadium owners decide who performs in their buildings. The First Amendment limits the government, not private owners. If owners can remove an act over a political slogan, that affects what performers are willing to say on the largest US stages.
Where it stands. The Examiner reports that the other opening acts have left the tour in solidarity. Sheeran's next concert is on Saturday at Lincoln Financial Field in Philadelphia.
What is being argued about
- Who removed Macklemore: the promoter, the venues, or Robert Kraft
- Whether stadium owners gave Sheeran an ultimatum
- Where Kraft's charity money goes: Palestinians, or Friends of the IDF and AIPAC's super PAC
- The words used for the slogan: "pro-Palestine", "anti-Israel", "campus protest"
Claims and verdicts
Washington Examiner
Washington Examiner
🇺🇸US ·
newspaper · independent
Washington Examiner
Washington Examiner
🇺🇸US ·
newspaper · independent
Washington Examiner
Washington Examiner
🇺🇸US ·
newspaper · independent
The Intercept
The Intercept
🇺🇸US ·
digital · independent
Robert Kraft Claims His Donations Help Palestinians. Turns Out He’s Funding Friends of the IDF.
Open this report in The AI Times →
Read it at The Intercept →
What we have measured
Asserted vs attributed The headline states where the money went as fact. It rests on the outlet's own reading of tax forms. ×1Own analysis stated flat The headline sets Kraft's words as a claim against the report's own reading of tax forms, which it states as fact. ×1What the year is measured in people who lost jobs and have not got them back ×1Who is counted as hurt people who lost work are the ones counted as harmed a year on ×1
Outlet profile in The AI Times →
Who wrote it
The Intercept
CNBC
Fox News
Washington Examiner
Breitbart
Coverage, outlet by outlet
The Intercept
The Intercept
🇺🇸US ·
digital · independent
Robert Kraft Claims His Donations Help Palestinians. Turns Out He’s Funding Friends of the IDF.
Open this report in The AI Times →
Read it at The Intercept →
What we have measured
Asserted vs attributed The headline states where the money went as fact. It rests on the outlet's own reading of tax forms. ×1Own analysis stated flat The headline sets Kraft's words as a claim against the report's own reading of tax forms, which it states as fact. ×1What the year is measured in people who lost jobs and have not got them back ×1Who is counted as hurt people who lost work are the ones counted as harmed a year on ×1
Outlet profile in The AI Times →
— independent
CNBC
CNBC
🇺🇸US ·
TV/radio · independent
Fox News
Fox News
🇺🇸US ·
TV/radio · independent
Washington Examiner
Washington Examiner
🇺🇸US ·
newspaper · independent
Breitbart
Breitbart
🇺🇸US ·
digital · independent
Mother Jones
Mother Jones
🇺🇸US ·
magazine · independent
What we have measured
Asserted, not attributed 'ultra-gerrymandered' stated as fact ×1Asserted versus attributed 'Cover-up' is asserted in the report's own voice, not attributed ×1Asserted versus attributed calls it a cover-up in its own voice ×1Assertion vs attribution describes the operation as a 'violent occupation' in its own voice, with no source for the phrase ×1
Outlet profile in The AI Times →
Reuters
Reuters
🇺🇸US ·
wire · independent
What we have measured
Actor named The attacker is the subject of an active verb for both the deaths and the damage ×1Actor named No actor named for who cancelled the flights ×1Agreement stated flat, source in a tail attribution moved after the dash ×1Announcement written as settled A social-media post becomes a future indicative: the conversion will happen ×1
Outlet profile in The AI Times →
N
NPR
MSNBC
MSNBC
🇺🇸US ·
TV/radio · independent
What we have measured
Accuser not named The lede does not name the senator making the accusation ×1Actor named for the ban The White House is the subject of both verbs: it blocked journalists, then let CNN back in. ×1A first stated flat a never-before claim carried without a source attached ×1Asserted, not attributed absence of fraud evidence stated as fact ×1
Outlet profile in The AI Times →
The Hill
The Hill
🇺🇸US ·
digital · independent
What we have measured
Accusation attributed the word lying is placed in a named politician's mouth, not the outlet's ×1Actor named No actor named for who kept reporters out ×1Actor named No actor named for who let reporters back in ×1Actor named Names the state as the one that carried out the execution. ×1
Outlet profile in The AI Times →
The New York Times
The New York Times
🇺🇸US ·
newspaper · independent
What we have measured
Active and passive voice the ship is 'targeted' with no actor, one sentence before a named actor is given for the Saudi attack ×1Active vs passive voice Pike is named as the killer in the active voice; the botched execution has no actor named ×1Actor label Names the shooter by its backer, not by its own name. ×1Actor named Names the official and what the process did to Pike. ×1
Outlet profile in The AI Times →
National Review
National Review
🇺🇸US ·
magazine · independent
What we have measured
Asserted not attributed Doubt about the allegation is stated flat, in the outlet's own voice ×1Asserted not attributed An argument about deterrence is stated as fact ×1Asserted versus attributed calls it an abuse of power in its own voice ×1Asserted versus attributed 'Abuse of presidential power' is stated flat ×1
Outlet profile in The AI Times →
The Wall Street Journal
The Wall Street Journal
🇺🇸US ·
newspaper · independent
What we have measured
Outlet profile in The AI Times →