Washington Examiner reports a poll with Trump's approval up to 42%; a Hill headline says it has plunged 'into the 20s'
Six weeks before the midterms, two outlets gave opposite pictures of the President's standing on the same day. One names its poll and its sample. The other, as far as we can read it, names no poll at all.
Two figures, one day. On 23 September the Washington Examiner reported a John Zogby Strategies poll that put President Trump's approval at 42%, up from 38% last month. Earlier that day a Hill headline said his approval "plunges into the 20s, and Republicans give up". We hold that headline but not the text beneath it.
| Washington Examiner | The Hill | |
|---|---|---|
| Approval | 42%, up from 38% | "into the 20s" |
| Poll named | John Zogby Strategies | none in the headline |
| Who was asked | 1,007 likely midterm voters | not known to us |
| Margin of error | not given | not known to us |
| Generic ballot | Democratic lead down from 9 points to 6 | not known to us |
The Examiner carries its own counterweight. It cites an Economist/YouGov poll with Democrats 14 points ahead and a RealClearPolitics average of 8.3 points. It also cites Kalshi, a prediction market, which gives Democrats a 91% chance of taking the House. Then it asks whether the Zogby poll is "an outlier".
The pollster explains his own result. Jeremy Zogby told the Examiner that independents look "concerned about the specter of socialism". The report shows no poll question on socialism, and it quotes no one in reply.
What is not settled - Which poll The Hill's figure comes from, and whether it counts adults, registered voters or likely voters. - The Zogby poll's margin of error, field dates and method. The Examiner gives none of them. - Which figure is nearer the truth. Nothing we hold settles it.
What this is about. Two news reports give very different numbers for how many Americans approve of President Donald Trump. They come weeks before an election that will decide who controls Congress.
How it got here. Trump, a Republican, began his second term as president on 20 January 2025. Republicans hold majorities in both the House of Representatives and the Senate. The midterm elections fall on 3 November 2026. Every House seat is on the ballot, along with about a third of the Senate. The president is not on the ballot himself. But midterms are widely read as a verdict on him, and the president's party has usually lost seats in them.
The Washington Examiner describes a hard autumn for Republicans. Diesel is "way above $6 per gallon", there is "no end in sight to the war in Iran", and forecasters keep predicting a Democratic "blue wave".
Who the actors are. Pollsters such as John Zogby Strategies and Economist/YouGov survey samples of voters. An approval rating is the share of people who say they approve of the way the president is doing his job. The "generic ballot" asks which party a voter would back for Congress, without naming any candidates. Polling averages such as RealClearPolitics combine many polls. Prediction markets such as Kalshi let people bet on outcomes.
Why the method matters. Polls differ in who they ask: all adults, registered voters or likely voters. They also differ in how they ask, by phone or online. Every poll carries a margin of error. Two sound polls can differ by several points for these reasons alone. The gap between 42% and a figure in the 20s is far larger than that. That is why the poll behind each number matters.
What is at stake. If Democrats win either chamber, they can block the President's bills and open investigations into his administration.
Where it stands. The one poll we can read points up for the President. The one headline whose article we cannot read points sharply down.
What is being argued about
- A John Zogby Strategies poll of 1,007 likely voters puts Trump's approval at 42%, up from 38%
- A Hill headline says Trump's approval has fallen into the 20s, and names no poll we can see
- The Democratic lead on the generic ballot: 6 points in Zogby, 14 in Economist/YouGov, 8.3 in the RealClearPolitics average
- Whether the Zogby poll has caught a late swing to Republicans or is an outlier
Claims and verdicts
Washington Examiner
Washington Examiner
🇺🇸US ·
newspaper · independent
Poll offers ray of midterm hope for Republicans as Trump’s rating bounces back
Open this report in The AI Times →
Read it at Washington Examiner →
What we have measured
Accusation printed unanswered a named candidate is accused of responsibility for murders, with no response carried ×1Accused named Names one accused student, citing the lawsuit; no other report we hold names any of the accused ×1Accused named Names each person charged and gives their nationality. None of the defendants is quoted. ×1Accused named Names one accused student from the civil filing and attributes the claim to the lawsuit ×1
Outlet profile in The AI Times →
The Hill
The Hill
🇺🇸US ·
digital · independent
Washington Examiner
Washington Examiner
🇺🇸US ·
newspaper · independent
Poll offers ray of midterm hope for Republicans as Trump’s rating bounces back
Open this report in The AI Times →
Read it at Washington Examiner →
What we have measured
Accusation printed unanswered a named candidate is accused of responsibility for murders, with no response carried ×1Accused named Names one accused student, citing the lawsuit; no other report we hold names any of the accused ×1Accused named Names each person charged and gives their nationality. None of the defendants is quoted. ×1Accused named Names one accused student from the civil filing and attributes the claim to the lawsuit ×1
Outlet profile in The AI Times →
Washington Examiner
Washington Examiner
🇺🇸US ·
newspaper · independent
Poll offers ray of midterm hope for Republicans as Trump’s rating bounces back
Open this report in The AI Times →
Read it at Washington Examiner →
What we have measured
Accusation printed unanswered a named candidate is accused of responsibility for murders, with no response carried ×1Accused named Names one accused student, citing the lawsuit; no other report we hold names any of the accused ×1Accused named Names each person charged and gives their nationality. None of the defendants is quoted. ×1Accused named Names one accused student from the civil filing and attributes the claim to the lawsuit ×1
Outlet profile in The AI Times →
Who wrote it
Washington Examiner
The Hill
Coverage, outlet by outlet
Washington Examiner
Washington Examiner
🇺🇸US ·
newspaper · independent
Poll offers ray of midterm hope for Republicans as Trump’s rating bounces back
Open this report in The AI Times →
Read it at Washington Examiner →
What we have measured
Accusation printed unanswered a named candidate is accused of responsibility for murders, with no response carried ×1Accused named Names one accused student, citing the lawsuit; no other report we hold names any of the accused ×1Accused named Names each person charged and gives their nationality. None of the defendants is quoted. ×1Accused named Names one accused student from the civil filing and attributes the claim to the lawsuit ×1
Outlet profile in The AI Times →
— independent
The Hill
The Hill
🇺🇸US ·
digital · independent
Mother Jones
Mother Jones
🇺🇸US ·
magazine · independent
What we have measured
Asserted, not attributed 'ultra-gerrymandered' stated as fact ×1Asserted versus attributed 'Cover-up' is asserted in the report's own voice, not attributed ×1Asserted versus attributed calls it a cover-up in its own voice ×1Assertion vs attribution describes the operation as a 'violent occupation' in its own voice, with no source for the phrase ×1
Outlet profile in The AI Times →
Reuters
Reuters
🇺🇸US ·
wire · independent
What we have measured
Actor named The attacker is the subject of an active verb for both the deaths and the damage ×1Actor named No actor named for who cancelled the flights ×1Agreement stated flat, source in a tail attribution moved after the dash ×1Announcement written as settled A social-media post becomes a future indicative: the conversion will happen ×1
Outlet profile in The AI Times →
N
NPR
Fox News
Fox News
🇺🇸US ·
TV/radio · independent
What we have measured
Accused named Names one former fraternity member through his lawyer's denial. The woman is anonymous by her own choice. ×1Actor in headline The headline names Trump as the one acting. The body names only Anduril. ×1A number, with no people named The only report that gives a figure counts the journalists whose communications were swept up. It names none of them. ×1Asserted, not attributed stated flat: past court defeats are asserted with no case, judge or date named ×1
Outlet profile in The AI Times →
Breitbart
Breitbart
🇺🇸US ·
digital · independent
What we have measured
Anyone hurt is counted, not named eight deaths given as a number only ×1Framing of motive The lede calls the denial a punishment and puts 'fake news' in quotation marks; the officials being sued are left unnamed ×1How the person shot is named a status, not a name: the only report that never uses either name calls him an illegal alien ×1How the place is described a party label attached to the city in the same clause as the casualty count ×1
Outlet profile in The AI Times →
MSNBC
MSNBC
🇺🇸US ·
TV/radio · independent
What we have measured
Accuser not named The lede does not name the senator making the accusation ×1Actor named for the ban The White House is the subject of both verbs: it blocked journalists, then let CNN back in. ×1A first stated flat a never-before claim carried without a source attached ×1Asserted, not attributed absence of fraud evidence stated as fact ×1
Outlet profile in The AI Times →
The New York Times
The New York Times
🇺🇸US ·
newspaper · independent
What we have measured
Active and passive voice the ship is 'targeted' with no actor, one sentence before a named actor is given for the Saudi attack ×1Active vs passive voice Pike is named as the killer in the active voice; the botched execution has no actor named ×1Actor label Names the shooter by its backer, not by its own name. ×1Actor named Names the official and what the process did to Pike. ×1
Outlet profile in The AI Times →
National Review
National Review
🇺🇸US ·
magazine · independent
What we have measured
Asserted not attributed Doubt about the allegation is stated flat, in the outlet's own voice ×1Asserted not attributed An argument about deterrence is stated as fact ×1Asserted versus attributed calls it an abuse of power in its own voice ×1Asserted versus attributed 'Abuse of presidential power' is stated flat ×1
Outlet profile in The AI Times →
The Wall Street Journal
The Wall Street Journal
🇺🇸US ·
newspaper · independent
What we have measured
Outlet profile in The AI Times →