The AI Times
United States
Read another desk
All Geopolitics & international affairsEconomyUnited StatesAnglosphereEuropeRussia & EurasiaLevant & Iran Gulf & Türkiye North Africa Africa South Asia East Asia Latin America Energy Technology Media Watch
Sections
News Panel Outlets Headlines Analysis & editorial coming soon
Who we are Alerts Pricing Sign in / up
Desks
All Geopolitics & international affairsEconomyUnited StatesAnglosphereEuropeRussia & EurasiaLevant & Iran Gulf & Türkiye North Africa Africa South Asia East Asia Latin America Energy Technology Media Watch
The AI Times
every claim sourced| every source shown| always on watch

Washington Examiner reports a poll with Trump's approval up to 42%; a Hill headline says it has plunged 'into the 20s'

Six weeks before the midterms, two outlets gave opposite pictures of the President's standing on the same day. One names its poll and its sample. The other, as far as we can read it, names no poll at all.

Poll offers ray of midterm hope for Republicans as Trump’s rating bounces back
Poll offers ray of midterm hope for Republicans as Trump’s rating bounces back as published by Washington Examiner · seen at Washington Examiner
United States United States

Two figures, one day. On 23 September the Washington Examiner reported a John Zogby Strategies poll that put President Trump's approval at 42%, up from 38% last month. Earlier that day a Hill headline said his approval "plunges into the 20s, and Republicans give up". We hold that headline but not the text beneath it.

Washington Examiner The Hill
Approval 42%, up from 38% "into the 20s"
Poll named John Zogby Strategies none in the headline
Who was asked 1,007 likely midterm voters not known to us
Margin of error not given not known to us
Generic ballot Democratic lead down from 9 points to 6 not known to us

The Examiner carries its own counterweight. It cites an Economist/YouGov poll with Democrats 14 points ahead and a RealClearPolitics average of 8.3 points. It also cites Kalshi, a prediction market, which gives Democrats a 91% chance of taking the House. Then it asks whether the Zogby poll is "an outlier".

The pollster explains his own result. Jeremy Zogby told the Examiner that independents look "concerned about the specter of socialism". The report shows no poll question on socialism, and it quotes no one in reply.

What is not settled - Which poll The Hill's figure comes from, and whether it counts adults, registered voters or likely voters. - The Zogby poll's margin of error, field dates and method. The Examiner gives none of them. - Which figure is nearer the truth. Nothing we hold settles it.

What this is about. Two news reports give very different numbers for how many Americans approve of President Donald Trump. They come weeks before an election that will decide who controls Congress.

How it got here. Trump, a Republican, began his second term as president on 20 January 2025. Republicans hold majorities in both the House of Representatives and the Senate. The midterm elections fall on 3 November 2026. Every House seat is on the ballot, along with about a third of the Senate. The president is not on the ballot himself. But midterms are widely read as a verdict on him, and the president's party has usually lost seats in them.

The Washington Examiner describes a hard autumn for Republicans. Diesel is "way above $6 per gallon", there is "no end in sight to the war in Iran", and forecasters keep predicting a Democratic "blue wave".

Who the actors are. Pollsters such as John Zogby Strategies and Economist/YouGov survey samples of voters. An approval rating is the share of people who say they approve of the way the president is doing his job. The "generic ballot" asks which party a voter would back for Congress, without naming any candidates. Polling averages such as RealClearPolitics combine many polls. Prediction markets such as Kalshi let people bet on outcomes.

Why the method matters. Polls differ in who they ask: all adults, registered voters or likely voters. They also differ in how they ask, by phone or online. Every poll carries a margin of error. Two sound polls can differ by several points for these reasons alone. The gap between 42% and a figure in the 20s is far larger than that. That is why the poll behind each number matters.

What is at stake. If Democrats win either chamber, they can block the President's bills and open investigations into his administration.

Where it stands. The one poll we can read points up for the President. The one headline whose article we cannot read points sharply down.

What is being argued about

  • A John Zogby Strategies poll of 1,007 likely voters puts Trump's approval at 42%, up from 38%
  • A Hill headline says Trump's approval has fallen into the 20s, and names no poll we can see
  • The Democratic lead on the generic ballot: 6 points in Zogby, 14 in Economist/YouGov, 8.3 in the RealClearPolitics average
  • Whether the Zogby poll has caught a late swing to Republicans or is an outlier
Two approval figures, and what each report tells us about its pollSide by side
OutletApproval figurePoll namedSampleMargin of error
Washington Examiner42%, up from 38% last monthJohn Zogby Strategies1,007 likely midterm votersnot given
The Hill"into the 20s"none in the headlinenot known to usnot known to us
We hold only the headline of The Hill's report. Its text may name a poll we cannot see.
Sources Washington Examiner
Right estimate · not a score
Washington Examiner 🇺🇸US · newspaper · independent Poll offers ray of midterm hope for Republicans as Trump’s rating bounces back Open this report in The AI Times → Read it at Washington Examiner → What we have measured Accusation printed unanswered a named candidate is accused of responsibility for murders, with no response carried ×1Accused named Names one accused student, citing the lawsuit; no other report we hold names any of the accused ×1Accused named Names each person charged and gives their nationality. None of the defendants is quoted. ×1Accused named Names one accused student from the civil filing and attributes the claim to the lawsuit ×1 from 3435 articles we hold · quote attached Outlet profile in The AI Times →
The Hill
Centre estimate · not a score
The Hill 🇺🇸US · digital · independent Trump’s approval plunges into the 20s, and Republicans give up Open this report in The AI Times → Read it at The Hill → What we have measured Accusation attributed the word lying is placed in a named politician's mouth, not the outlet's ×1Actor named No actor named for who kept reporters out ×1Actor named No actor named for who let reporters back in ×1Actor named Names the state as the one that carried out the execution. ×1 from 4315 articles we hold · quote attached Outlet profile in The AI Times →
Democrats' lead on the generic ballot, by measureChart
All three figures are as the Washington Examiner reports them. That report gives a margin of error for none of them.
Sources Washington Examiner
Right estimate · not a score
Washington Examiner 🇺🇸US · newspaper · independent Poll offers ray of midterm hope for Republicans as Trump’s rating bounces back Open this report in The AI Times → Read it at Washington Examiner → What we have measured Accusation printed unanswered a named candidate is accused of responsibility for murders, with no response carried ×1Accused named Names one accused student, citing the lawsuit; no other report we hold names any of the accused ×1Accused named Names each person charged and gives their nationality. None of the defendants is quoted. ×1Accused named Names one accused student from the civil filing and attributes the claim to the lawsuit ×1 from 3435 articles we hold · quote attached Outlet profile in The AI Times →
The bias in this coverageBias

One figure has a method, one has a headline

One report names the pollster, the sample and the month-on-month change. The other gives an approval figure in the 20s and names no poll that we can read. Neither report gives a margin of error.

1 reports naming the pollster 1 reports giving a sample size 0 reports giving a margin of error

The same report carries its own counterweight

The report on the 42% figure also cites a prediction market, a polling average and a second poll. All three point towards Democrats. It then asks whether its own poll is an outlier.

3 other measures cited in the 42% report 3 of those pointing towards Democrats
Scored without the mastheads. Where the two passes differ, both are kept.
Sources Washington Examiner
Right estimate · not a score
Washington Examiner 🇺🇸US · newspaper · independent Poll offers ray of midterm hope for Republicans as Trump’s rating bounces back Open this report in The AI Times → Read it at Washington Examiner → What we have measured Accusation printed unanswered a named candidate is accused of responsibility for murders, with no response carried ×1Accused named Names one accused student, citing the lawsuit; no other report we hold names any of the accused ×1Accused named Names each person charged and gives their nationality. None of the defendants is quoted. ×1Accused named Names one accused student from the civil filing and attributes the claim to the lawsuit ×1 from 3435 articles we hold · quote attached Outlet profile in The AI Times →
The Hill
Centre estimate · not a score
The Hill 🇺🇸US · digital · independent Trump’s approval plunges into the 20s, and Republicans give up Open this report in The AI Times → Read it at The Hill → What we have measured Accusation attributed the word lying is placed in a named politician's mouth, not the outlet's ×1Actor named No actor named for who kept reporters out ×1Actor named No actor named for who let reporters back in ×1Actor named Names the state as the one that carried out the execution. ×1 from 4315 articles we hold · quote attached Outlet profile in The AI Times →

Claims and verdicts

unverified A John Zogby Strategies poll found 42% of likely voters approve of Trump's job performance, up from 38% last month.
Only the Washington Examiner reports this poll, with a sample of 1,007 likely midterm voters and no margin of error given. No other report we hold confirms or challenges the figure.
Checked against 1 source:
Washington Examiner
Right estimate · not a score
Washington Examiner 🇺🇸US · newspaper · independent Poll offers ray of midterm hope for Republicans as Trump’s rating bounces back Open this report in The AI Times → Read it at Washington Examiner → What we have measured Accusation printed unanswered a named candidate is accused of responsibility for murders, with no response carried ×1Accused named Names one accused student, citing the lawsuit; no other report we hold names any of the accused ×1Accused named Names each person charged and gives their nationality. None of the defendants is quoted. ×1Accused named Names one accused student from the civil filing and attributes the claim to the lawsuit ×1 from 3435 articles we hold · quote attached Outlet profile in The AI Times →
disputed Trump's approval rating has fallen into the 20s.
The claim appears only in a Hill headline, and we do not hold the article's text, the poll behind it or its method. The Zogby poll reported by the Washington Examiner puts approval at 42%, and a different poll could explain the gap, but nothing we hold settles which figure is right.
Checked against 2 sources:
The Hill
Centre estimate · not a score
The Hill 🇺🇸US · digital · independent Trump’s approval plunges into the 20s, and Republicans give up Open this report in The AI Times → Read it at The Hill → What we have measured Accusation attributed the word lying is placed in a named politician's mouth, not the outlet's ×1Actor named No actor named for who kept reporters out ×1Actor named No actor named for who let reporters back in ×1Actor named Names the state as the one that carried out the execution. ×1 from 4315 articles we hold · quote attached Outlet profile in The AI Times →
Washington Examiner
Right estimate · not a score
Washington Examiner 🇺🇸US · newspaper · independent Poll offers ray of midterm hope for Republicans as Trump’s rating bounces back Open this report in The AI Times → Read it at Washington Examiner → What we have measured Accusation printed unanswered a named candidate is accused of responsibility for murders, with no response carried ×1Accused named Names one accused student, citing the lawsuit; no other report we hold names any of the accused ×1Accused named Names each person charged and gives their nationality. None of the defendants is quoted. ×1Accused named Names one accused student from the civil filing and attributes the claim to the lawsuit ×1 from 3435 articles we hold · quote attached Outlet profile in The AI Times →
unverified Republicans narrowed the Democrats' generic-ballot lead from 9 points to 6.
This is the Zogby poll as reported by the Washington Examiner, and it is the only account we hold. The same article reports an Economist/YouGov poll giving Democrats a 14-point lead and a RealClearPolitics average of 8.3, and asks whether Zogby is an outlier.
Checked against 1 source:
Washington Examiner
Right estimate · not a score
Washington Examiner 🇺🇸US · newspaper · independent Poll offers ray of midterm hope for Republicans as Trump’s rating bounces back Open this report in The AI Times → Read it at Washington Examiner → What we have measured Accusation printed unanswered a named candidate is accused of responsibility for murders, with no response carried ×1Accused named Names one accused student, citing the lawsuit; no other report we hold names any of the accused ×1Accused named Names each person charged and gives their nationality. None of the defendants is quoted. ×1Accused named Names one accused student from the civil filing and attributes the claim to the lawsuit ×1 from 3435 articles we hold · quote attached Outlet profile in The AI Times →

Who wrote it

R Rob Crilly Washington Examiner
What the bias passes found in their reporting
Accusation printed unanswered a named candidate is accused of responsibility for murders, with no response carried×1
Asserted, not attributed A claim about what voters are hearing is written in the report's own voice.×1
Asserted not attributed A contributor states a foreign endorsement as fact, with no source×1
Claim stated flat An Iranian endorsement of Democrats is asserted with no source×1
Claims we checked that rest on their reporting
1 disputed11 unverified2 true
From 36 reports we hold under this byline, at Washington Examiner. Two independent readings, each made without the masthead, a quote attached to every tag. A record, never a rating. Their full record →
M Max Burns The Hill
What the bias passes found in their reporting
Figure with no method the headline gives a range and a verdict; no poll, pollster or sample is visible×1
Headline with no poll named The headline gives a figure in the 20s but names no poll. We hold no body text for this report.×1
Claims we checked that rest on their reporting
1 disputed
From 10 reports we hold under this byline, at The Hill, MSNBC. Two independent readings, each made without the masthead, a quote attached to every tag. A record, never a rating. Their full record →
The bylines on the reports this story is built from. Hover one for what our passes have measured on their reporting.

Coverage, outlet by outlet

Washington Examiner
Right estimate · not a score
Washington Examiner 🇺🇸US · newspaper · independent Poll offers ray of midterm hope for Republicans as Trump’s rating bounces back Open this report in The AI Times → Read it at Washington Examiner → What we have measured Accusation printed unanswered a named candidate is accused of responsibility for murders, with no response carried ×1Accused named Names one accused student, citing the lawsuit; no other report we hold names any of the accused ×1Accused named Names each person charged and gives their nationality. None of the defendants is quoted. ×1Accused named Names one accused student from the civil filing and attributes the claim to the lawsuit ×1 from 3435 articles we hold · quote attached Outlet profile in The AI Times →
— independent
The only report that names a pollster, a sample and a change from last month. It is also the only one that sets other polls against its own and asks whether its poll is an outlier.
Welcome to Wednesday’s edition of Washington Secrets. If a friend sent you this and you’d like to sign up, CLICK HERE. Today, we bring out the rarely used “good news for Republicans” midterm klaxon. Plus, we ask which luxury-loving politician was spotted slumming it in economy on the way back from the United Nations. And which Democrat was stoking 2028 speculation in D.C. on Tuesday evening? Donald Trump’s approval ratings are bouncing back, and Republicans are closing the gap on Democrats ahead of the midterm elections, according to a new poll by John Zogby Strategies. Recommended Stories Pol
Framing before the figures: the report tells readers the news is good for one party before it gives the numbers — “Today, we bring out the rarely used “good news for Republicans” midterm klaxon.”
Method partly given: sample size and population are given; margin of error and survey mode are not — “The poll of 1,007 likely midterm voters”
Pollster interprets own poll: the pollster explains the movement, and no question on socialism is shown — ““And the movement we see now, it looks like more Independents are concerned about the specter of socialism,” he said.”
Claim with no source: a claim about what voters hear is stated flat, with no poll behind it — “Voters aren’t hearing much beyond Democrats’ criticism of Trump and have yet to hear a clear, coherent strategy for bringing down prices.”
Other evidence included: the report sets its poll against a poll pointing the other way — “The latest Economist/YouGov poll, published Tuesday, gave Democratic candidates a 14-point lead over Republicans.”
Framing before the figure: The report sets up the poll as good news for one party before it gives any number. — “Today, we bring out the rarely used “good news for Republicans” midterm klaxon.”
Method partly given: The report gives the sample size and the population surveyed. It gives no margin of error and no dates the poll was taken. — “The poll of 1,007 likely midterm voters stands as a rare ray of hope for Republicans”
Pollster's reading unchallenged: The pollster explains his own result in partisan terms, and no one else is quoted in reply. — “it looks like more Independents are concerned about the specter of socialism”
Asserted, not attributed: A claim about what voters are hearing is written in the report's own voice. — “Voters aren’t hearing much beyond Democrats’ criticism of Trump and have yet to hear a clear, coherent strategy for bringing down prices.”
Counter figure given: The report sets a poll that points the other way beside its lead poll. — “The latest Economist/YouGov poll, published Tuesday, gave Democratic candidates a 14-point lead over Republicans.”
Read it at Washington Examiner → https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/washington-secrets/4736530/poll…
The Hill
Centre estimate · not a score
The Hill 🇺🇸US · digital · independent Trump’s approval plunges into the 20s, and Republicans give up Open this report in The AI Times → Read it at The Hill → What we have measured Accusation attributed the word lying is placed in a named politician's mouth, not the outlet's ×1Actor named No actor named for who kept reporters out ×1Actor named No actor named for who let reporters back in ×1Actor named Names the state as the one that carried out the execution. ×1 from 4315 articles we hold · quote attached Outlet profile in The AI Times →
— independent
The only report that puts Trump's approval "into the 20s" and says Republicans "give up". We hold its headline, not its text.
Figure with no method: the headline gives a range and a verdict; no poll, pollster or sample is visible — “Trump’s approval plunges into the 20s, and Republicans give up”
Headline with no poll named: The headline gives a figure in the 20s but names no poll. We hold no body text for this report. — “Trump’s approval plunges into the 20s, and Republicans give up”
Read it at The Hill → https://thehill.com/opinion/campaign/6104722-trump-approval-low-gop/
Checked, didn’t cover
Mother Jones
Left estimate · not a score
Mother Jones 🇺🇸US · magazine · independent No report held from this outlet on this story. What we have measured Asserted, not attributed 'ultra-gerrymandered' stated as fact ×1Asserted versus attributed 'Cover-up' is asserted in the report's own voice, not attributed ×1Asserted versus attributed calls it a cover-up in its own voice ×1Assertion vs attribution describes the operation as a 'violent occupation' in its own voice, with no source for the phrase ×1 from 361 articles we hold · quote attached Outlet profile in The AI Times →
Reuters
Centre estimate · not a score
Reuters 🇺🇸US · wire · independent No report held from this outlet on this story. What we have measured Actor named The attacker is the subject of an active verb for both the deaths and the damage ×1Actor named No actor named for who cancelled the flights ×1Agreement stated flat, source in a tail attribution moved after the dash ×1Announcement written as settled A social-media post becomes a future indicative: the conversion will happen ×1 from 13380 articles we hold · quote attached Outlet profile in The AI Times →
N NPR
Centre estimate · not a score
NPR 🇺🇸US · public broadcaster · independent No report held from this outlet on this story. What we have measured Asserted, not attributed that the system wrongly flagged citizens is stated flat, with no source named for it ×1Asserted versus attributed public disbelief stated as established, with nothing cited that measured it ×1Asserted versus attributed Past threats of force are stated flat, as background ×1Asymmetric labelling one side tagged by its patron, the other not ×1 from 1144 articles we hold · quote attached Outlet profile in The AI Times →
P Politico
Centre estimate · not a score
Politico 🇺🇸US · digital · independent No report held from this outlet on this story. What we have measured Nothing scored yet. We do not carry a rating for any outlet — only what we have measured from published text. Outlet profile in The AI Times →
T The Washington Post
Centre-left estimate · not a score
The Washington Post 🇺🇸US · newspaper · independent No report held from this outlet on this story. What we have measured Accused's denial carried the only report carrying the Marine's side ×1Actor named via accusation the administration is named as acting, through the ranchers' charge; the price rise is stated flat ×1Asserted, not attributed a shift of power to Iran stated flat in the headline ×1Asserted or attributed the headline states as data what the body shows the chair selecting in a speech ×1 from 1237 articles we hold · quote attached Outlet profile in The AI Times →
Fox News
Right estimate · not a score
Fox News 🇺🇸US · TV/radio · independent No report held from this outlet on this story. What we have measured Accused named Names one former fraternity member through his lawyer's denial. The woman is anonymous by her own choice. ×1Actor in headline The headline names Trump as the one acting. The body names only Anduril. ×1A number, with no people named The only report that gives a figure counts the journalists whose communications were swept up. It names none of them. ×1Asserted, not attributed stated flat: past court defeats are asserted with no case, judge or date named ×1 from 6432 articles we hold · quote attached Outlet profile in The AI Times →
Breitbart
Right estimate · not a score
Breitbart 🇺🇸US · digital · independent No report held from this outlet on this story. What we have measured Anyone hurt is counted, not named eight deaths given as a number only ×1Framing of motive The lede calls the denial a punishment and puts 'fake news' in quotation marks; the officials being sued are left unnamed ×1How the person shot is named a status, not a name: the only report that never uses either name calls him an illegal alien ×1How the place is described a party label attached to the city in the same clause as the casualty count ×1 from 3584 articles we hold · quote attached Outlet profile in The AI Times →
MSNBC
Left estimate · not a score
MSNBC 🇺🇸US · TV/radio · independent No report held from this outlet on this story. What we have measured Accuser not named The lede does not name the senator making the accusation ×1Actor named for the ban The White House is the subject of both verbs: it blocked journalists, then let CNN back in. ×1A first stated flat a never-before claim carried without a source attached ×1Asserted, not attributed absence of fraud evidence stated as fact ×1 from 1470 articles we hold · quote attached Outlet profile in The AI Times →
The New York Times
Centre-left estimate · not a score
The New York Times 🇺🇸US · newspaper · independent No report held from this outlet on this story. What we have measured Active and passive voice the ship is 'targeted' with no actor, one sentence before a named actor is given for the Saudi attack ×1Active vs passive voice Pike is named as the killer in the active voice; the botched execution has no actor named ×1Actor label Names the shooter by its backer, not by its own name. ×1Actor named Names the official and what the process did to Pike. ×1 from 3862 articles we hold · quote attached Outlet profile in The AI Times →
National Review
Centre-right estimate · not a score
National Review 🇺🇸US · magazine · independent No report held from this outlet on this story. What we have measured Asserted not attributed Doubt about the allegation is stated flat, in the outlet's own voice ×1Asserted not attributed An argument about deterrence is stated as fact ×1Asserted versus attributed calls it an abuse of power in its own voice ×1Asserted versus attributed 'Abuse of presidential power' is stated flat ×1 from 414 articles we hold · quote attached Outlet profile in The AI Times →
Silence is recorded, not inferred — each of these was read when we built this story and carried nothing on this event.
We could not read these
The Wall Street Journal
Centre-right estimate · not a score
The Wall Street Journal 🇺🇸US · newspaper · independent No report held from this outlet on this story. What we have measured Nothing scored yet. We do not carry a rating for any outlet — only what we have measured from published text. Outlet profile in The AI Times →
Associated Press
Centre estimate · not a score
Associated Press 🇺🇸US · wire · independent No report held from this outlet on this story. What we have measured Dating and attribution Dates the signing to Aug. 6, 2026 and writes ord ×1Dating and attribution Carries a dateline correction, repeated three ti ×1How hard the claim is stated Marks "birth tourism" as the administration's ow ×1How hard the claim is stated high ×1 from 223 articles we hold · quote attached Outlet profile in The AI Times →
These are must-cite outlets for this desk that we did not manage to read when we built this story. That is a gap in our reach, not a silence on their part, and it is not evidence of anything about this story.

Sign in to The AI Times

Everything is free while we are building it. Signing in is how comments, likes and your reading stay yours.

Continue with Google

Sign-in is coming soon.

By continuing you agree to be a reader of a paper that shows its working.

×