The AI Times
Levant & Iran
Read another desk
All Geopolitics & international affairsEconomyUnited StatesAnglosphereEuropeRussia & EurasiaLevant & Iran Gulf & Türkiye North Africa Africa South Asia East Asia Latin America Energy Technology Media Watch
Sections
News Panel Outlets Headlines Analysis & editorial coming soon
Registers
All news Outlets Journalists
Who we are Alerts Pricing Sign in / up
Desks
All Geopolitics & international affairsEconomyUnited StatesAnglosphereEuropeRussia & EurasiaLevant & Iran Gulf & Türkiye North Africa Africa South Asia East Asia Latin America Energy Technology Media Watch
The AI Times
every claim sourced| every source shown| always on watch

Al-Modon says 'NAZA' "exposes Israel"; the Jerusalem Post says its director "claims" Israel did not cover Gaza's dead

An Israeli documentary about civilian deaths in Gaza has become an argument over what Israeli television showed, and over threats to the people who made it. Four outlets tell it four ways. Two report threats, and neither says who made them.

'Why didn't you broadcast it?': 'NAZA' director claims Israel did not cover Gaza civilian deaths
'Why didn't you broadcast it?': 'NAZA' director claims Israel did not cover Gaza civilian deaths as published by The Jerusalem Post · seen at The Jerusalem Post
Levant & Iran Israel Palestine

Four reports, four stories. We hold four reports on 'NAZA', all published on 15 September. Three are from Israeli outlets and one is from a Lebanese outlet. Each leads on something different.

Outlet What it leads with On threats
Al-Modon (Lebanon) The film "exposes Israel". The army is on alert. The director is "threatened". Says so. Names no source.
Arutz Sheva (Israel) The journalists' union backs the makers. Journalists Amit Segal and Noam Amir attack the union. Reports "threats and violent reactions". Names no source.
The Jerusalem Post (Israel) Co-director Abraham: "Why didn't you broadcast something complex yourself?" Not in the text we hold
Haaretz (Israel) The world pays attention to atrocities against Palestinians only when Israelis describe them. Not in the text we hold

Stated, or a claim. Haaretz and Al-Modon say in their own voice that the film shows atrocities or "Israeli crimes". Haaretz names no one as committing them. The Jerusalem Post's headline says the co-director "claims" Israel did not cover Gaza's civilian dead.

Threats. 2 of 4 reports say the makers were threatened. 0 say who threatened them.

What is not settled - Whether Israeli broadcasters showed Gaza's civilian dead. No report we hold checks the co-director's charge against what they aired. - Whether the army did anything. Only Al-Modon's headline says so, and the text we hold does not explain it. - Who made the threats. - How many dead the film shows. No report gives a figure. - What Palestinians say. None of the reports we hold is from a Palestinian outlet.

What this is about: an Israeli documentary, 'NAZA', about civilians killed in Gaza, and the fight in Israel over whether Israeli television showed that side of the war.

How it got here - 7 October 2023: Hamas-led fighters attacked southern Israel, killed civilians and soldiers, and took hostages into Gaza. Israel went to war in Gaza the same day. - The war: Israel's bombing and ground campaign reached almost every part of the Strip and displaced most of its people. Gaza's Health Ministry, part of the Hamas-run government, counts the dead. Israel disputes those counts. Both are party claims. - Access: For most of the war, Israel did not let foreign reporters into Gaza on their own. Most of what the world saw came from Palestinian journalists inside Gaza, many of whom were killed. - October 2025: A US-brokered ceasefire began, and the hostages still alive were released. - September 2026: Al-Modon reports that 'NAZA' won an award. The reports we hold do not say which one.

Who is involved - The filmmakers: Israelis. Their charge is aimed at their own country's media. - Israeli broadcasters: Israel's main channels served a home audience living through the attack and the hostage crisis. Critics in Israel say those channels rarely showed Gaza's dead. The broadcasters say they reported the war. Israel's military censor also limits what Israeli media may publish on security matters. - The Union of Journalists in Israel: Israel's main journalists' union. It has backed the filmmakers. - Critics of the film: They include Israeli television journalists.

What is at stake The argument is about how much Israelis were shown of what their army did in Gaza, and who gets to say so. It also tests how Israel treats Israelis who make that case, now that the makers report threats.

Where it stands The film is out and being argued over. Nobody has named who made the threats. No report we hold compares the film's charge with what Israeli channels actually broadcast.

The story so far

Earlier stories The AI Times filed on this thread.

What is being argued about

  • Whether Israeli broadcasters showed Gaza's civilian deaths, as co-director Abraham says they did not
  • Threats against the film's makers, reported by two outlets with no source named
  • The journalists' union's defence of the makers, and the journalists who attacked it
  • Whether the world hears Palestinian deaths only when Israelis describe them
Four outlets, four versions of the 'NAZA' storySide by side
outletwhat it saidhedged?
Al-Modon"'NAZA' exposes Israel: the army is on alert... and the director is threatened"No. The crimes, the army alert and the threat are all stated flat, and no source is named for the threat.
Arutz ShevaThe union "defended the film's creators amid threats and violent reactions"No. The threats are stated flat, and no one is named as making them.
The Jerusalem Post"'NAZA' director claims Israel did not cover Gaza civilian deaths"Yes. The headline puts "claims" on the co-director's charge.
Haaretz"atrocities committed against the Palestinians"No. The atrocities are stated flat, with no one named as committing them.
Quotes from each outlet's published text. Al-Modon is translated from Arabic. This counts wording. It does not rate any outlet.
Sources A Al-Modon
Centre-left estimate · not a score
Al-Modon 🇱🇧LB · digital · فيلم "نازا" يفضح إسرائيل: الجيش يستنفر...والمُخرج مُهدد Open this report in The AI Times → Read it at Al-Modon → What we have measured Actor left unnamed a man is killed by an air strike in the headline with nobody named as striking; shelling and demolitions simply "continue" ×1Actor named The Israeli army is named as the shooter. ×1Actor named, action nominalised Israeli escalation is named but arrives as a wave, not as a doer ×1Affected people The only report that looks at people in the south: the explosions, the fear and the displacement. ×1 from 3381 articles we hold · quote attached Outlet profile in The AI Times → A Arutz Sheva
Right estimate · not a score
Arutz Sheva 🇮🇱IL · digital · Journalists' union backs Naza filmmakers, draws fierce backlash Open this report in The AI Times → Read it at Arutz Sheva → What we have measured A caveat kept in the only report we hold that says the rejection was of a promo, not the finished film ×1A different word, and a hedge Calls the same event an airstrike rather than a controlled demolition, and marks it "Reported" while offering footage as its evidence. ×1An allegation stated as established the headline presents the plan as fact and as a disclosure, with no attribution to the charge sheet ×1Asserted flat Calls it a 'terror network' and says Iran helped build it, in its own voice, with no source. ×1 from 2982 articles we hold · quote attached Outlet profile in The AI Times → The Jerusalem Post
Centre-right estimate · not a score
The Jerusalem Post 🇮🇱IL · newspaper · independent 'Why didn't you broadcast it?': 'NAZA' director claims Israel did not cover Gaza civilian deaths Open this report in The AI Times → Read it at The Jerusalem Post → What we have measured A count the body does not carry the headline says eight countries; the sentence names seven foreign ministers ×1Actor framing The Gulf ministers are the ones acting. Iran is the party they meet. ×1Actor generalised The headline has 'Baghdad' celebrating. The photo caption says the crowd is supporters of one armed group. ×1Actor named names the militias and calls the act 'desecration', in its own voice ×1 from 4111 articles we hold · quote attached Outlet profile in The AI Times → Haaretz
Centre-left estimate · not a score
Haaretz 🇮🇱IL · newspaper · independent If the world listened to Palestinians, NAZA wouldn't be necessary Open this report in The AI Times → Read it at Haaretz → What we have measured A previous framing corrected the twelve-country statement described as ambiguously worded ×1Asserted flat The report states as fact that barring Arab parties is a standing ritual. ×1Asserted flat The report says ethnicity explains the different outcomes, in its own voice. ×1Asserted in the report's own voice Parties are characterised by what they are said to promise, unattributed, and the headline calls the result frightening. ×1 from 1936 articles we hold · quote attached Outlet profile in The AI Times →
What the four reports doChart
Counted from the published text of all four reports. Two reports are only a headline and a sentence or two. It is a count, not a rating.
Sources A Al-Modon
Centre-left estimate · not a score
Al-Modon 🇱🇧LB · digital · فيلم "نازا" يفضح إسرائيل: الجيش يستنفر...والمُخرج مُهدد Open this report in The AI Times → Read it at Al-Modon → What we have measured Actor left unnamed a man is killed by an air strike in the headline with nobody named as striking; shelling and demolitions simply "continue" ×1Actor named The Israeli army is named as the shooter. ×1Actor named, action nominalised Israeli escalation is named but arrives as a wave, not as a doer ×1Affected people The only report that looks at people in the south: the explosions, the fear and the displacement. ×1 from 3381 articles we hold · quote attached Outlet profile in The AI Times → A Arutz Sheva
Right estimate · not a score
Arutz Sheva 🇮🇱IL · digital · Journalists' union backs Naza filmmakers, draws fierce backlash Open this report in The AI Times → Read it at Arutz Sheva → What we have measured A caveat kept in the only report we hold that says the rejection was of a promo, not the finished film ×1A different word, and a hedge Calls the same event an airstrike rather than a controlled demolition, and marks it "Reported" while offering footage as its evidence. ×1An allegation stated as established the headline presents the plan as fact and as a disclosure, with no attribution to the charge sheet ×1Asserted flat Calls it a 'terror network' and says Iran helped build it, in its own voice, with no source. ×1 from 2982 articles we hold · quote attached Outlet profile in The AI Times → The Jerusalem Post
Centre-right estimate · not a score
The Jerusalem Post 🇮🇱IL · newspaper · independent 'Why didn't you broadcast it?': 'NAZA' director claims Israel did not cover Gaza civilian deaths Open this report in The AI Times → Read it at The Jerusalem Post → What we have measured A count the body does not carry the headline says eight countries; the sentence names seven foreign ministers ×1Actor framing The Gulf ministers are the ones acting. Iran is the party they meet. ×1Actor generalised The headline has 'Baghdad' celebrating. The photo caption says the crowd is supporters of one armed group. ×1Actor named names the militias and calls the act 'desecration', in its own voice ×1 from 4111 articles we hold · quote attached Outlet profile in The AI Times → Haaretz
Centre-left estimate · not a score
Haaretz 🇮🇱IL · newspaper · independent If the world listened to Palestinians, NAZA wouldn't be necessary Open this report in The AI Times → Read it at Haaretz → What we have measured A previous framing corrected the twelve-country statement described as ambiguously worded ×1Asserted flat The report states as fact that barring Arab parties is a standing ritual. ×1Asserted flat The report says ethnicity explains the different outcomes, in its own voice. ×1Asserted in the report's own voice Parties are characterised by what they are said to promise, unattributed, and the headline calls the result frightening. ×1 from 1936 articles we hold · quote attached Outlet profile in The AI Times →
The bias in this coverageBias

Crimes: stated or claimed

Two reports say atrocities or crimes happened, in their own words. One headline calls the director's account a claim. The same events are fact in two reports and allegation in a third.

2 reports stating crimes or atrocities in their own voice 1 reports framing the director's account as a claim

Threats with no one behind them

Two reports say the film-makers were threatened. Neither says who threatened them. One names the two journalists who criticised the union that defended the film-makers.

2 reports mentioning threats to the film-makers 0 reports naming who made the threats 1 reports naming critics by name
Scored without the mastheads. Where the two passes differ, both are kept.
Sources The Jerusalem Post
Centre-right estimate · not a score
The Jerusalem Post 🇮🇱IL · newspaper · independent 'Why didn't you broadcast it?': 'NAZA' director claims Israel did not cover Gaza civilian deaths Open this report in The AI Times → Read it at The Jerusalem Post → What we have measured A count the body does not carry the headline says eight countries; the sentence names seven foreign ministers ×1Actor framing The Gulf ministers are the ones acting. Iran is the party they meet. ×1Actor generalised The headline has 'Baghdad' celebrating. The photo caption says the crowd is supporters of one armed group. ×1Actor named names the militias and calls the act 'desecration', in its own voice ×1 from 4111 articles we hold · quote attached Outlet profile in The AI Times → A Arutz Sheva
Right estimate · not a score
Arutz Sheva 🇮🇱IL · digital · Journalists' union backs Naza filmmakers, draws fierce backlash Open this report in The AI Times → Read it at Arutz Sheva → What we have measured A caveat kept in the only report we hold that says the rejection was of a promo, not the finished film ×1A different word, and a hedge Calls the same event an airstrike rather than a controlled demolition, and marks it "Reported" while offering footage as its evidence. ×1An allegation stated as established the headline presents the plan as fact and as a disclosure, with no attribution to the charge sheet ×1Asserted flat Calls it a 'terror network' and says Iran helped build it, in its own voice, with no source. ×1 from 2982 articles we hold · quote attached Outlet profile in The AI Times → Haaretz
Centre-left estimate · not a score
Haaretz 🇮🇱IL · newspaper · independent If the world listened to Palestinians, NAZA wouldn't be necessary Open this report in The AI Times → Read it at Haaretz → What we have measured A previous framing corrected the twelve-country statement described as ambiguously worded ×1Asserted flat The report states as fact that barring Arab parties is a standing ritual. ×1Asserted flat The report says ethnicity explains the different outcomes, in its own voice. ×1Asserted in the report's own voice Parties are characterised by what they are said to promise, unattributed, and the headline calls the result frightening. ×1 from 1936 articles we hold · quote attached Outlet profile in The AI Times → A Al-Modon
Centre-left estimate · not a score
Al-Modon 🇱🇧LB · digital · فيلم "نازا" يفضح إسرائيل: الجيش يستنفر...والمُخرج مُهدد Open this report in The AI Times → Read it at Al-Modon → What we have measured Actor left unnamed a man is killed by an air strike in the headline with nobody named as striking; shelling and demolitions simply "continue" ×1Actor named The Israeli army is named as the shooter. ×1Actor named, action nominalised Israeli escalation is named but arrives as a wave, not as a doer ×1Affected people The only report that looks at people in the south: the explosions, the fear and the displacement. ×1 from 3381 articles we hold · quote attached Outlet profile in The AI Times →

Claims and verdicts

No claims registered.

Who wrote it

C Corinne Baum The Jerusalem Post
What the bias passes found in their reporting
Hedge verb 'claims' put on the director's account of Israeli coverage×1
Verb of attribution headline calls the director's account a claim×1
From 13 reports we hold under this byline, at The Jerusalem Post. Two independent readings, each made without the masthead, a quote attached to every tag. A record, never a rating. Their full record →
A Adla Alnazer Haaretz
What the bias passes found in their reporting
Asserted versus attributed atrocities stated in the report's own voice, no actor named in the span×1
Asserted vs attributed atrocities stated flat, with no one named as committing them×1
From 1 report we hold under this byline, at Haaretz. Two independent readings, each made without the masthead, a quote attached to every tag. A record, never a rating. Their full record →
ا المدن - ميديا Al-Modon
What the bias passes found in their reporting
Asserted versus attributed Israeli crimes stated flat as what the film documents×1
Asserted vs attributed Israeli crimes against civilians stated in the report's own voice×1
Who is named as acting director threatened, no one named as threatening×1
Who is named as acting director 'threatened', with no one named behind the threat×1
From 259 reports we hold under this byline, at Al-Modon. Two independent readings, each made without the masthead, a quote attached to every tag. A record, never a rating. Their full record →
The bylines on the reports this story is built from. Hover one for what our passes have measured on their reporting. · 1 report we hold carries no byline — we do not invent one.

Coverage, outlet by outlet

The Jerusalem Post
Centre-right estimate · not a score
The Jerusalem Post 🇮🇱IL · newspaper · independent 'Why didn't you broadcast it?': 'NAZA' director claims Israel did not cover Gaza civilian deaths Open this report in The AI Times → Read it at The Jerusalem Post → What we have measured A count the body does not carry the headline says eight countries; the sentence names seven foreign ministers ×1Actor framing The Gulf ministers are the ones acting. Iran is the party they meet. ×1Actor generalised The headline has 'Baghdad' celebrating. The photo caption says the crowd is supporters of one armed group. ×1Actor named names the militias and calls the act 'desecration', in its own voice ×1 from 4111 articles we hold · quote attached Outlet profile in The AI Times → — independent
The only report that quotes one of the makers. Co-director Abraham asks broadcasters: "So why didn't you broadcast something complex yourself?"
NAZA co-director Yuval Abraham accused Israeli media of ignoring Gazan civilians' deaths for the entirety of the Israel-Hamas War after the film got significant pushback for its framing of the war in an interview with Israel's Channel 13 on Monday.NAZA, which is an IDF acronym for “collateral damage,” alleges that the military approved or planned strikes with AI assistance that killed hundreds of Gazan civilians. The IDF has denied the allegations.In the interview, journalist Raviv Drucker pressed Abraham on why he did not identify the sources in the documentary.In a new interview, Israeli jou
Verb of attribution: headline calls the director's account a claim — “'NAZA' director claims Israel did not cover Gaza civilian deaths”
Hedge verb: 'claims' put on the director's account of Israeli coverage — “director claims Israel did not cover Gaza civilian deaths”
Read it at The Jerusalem Post → https://www.jpost.com/israel-news/article-908673
A Arutz Sheva
Right estimate · not a score
Arutz Sheva 🇮🇱IL · digital · Journalists' union backs Naza filmmakers, draws fierce backlash Open this report in The AI Times → Read it at Arutz Sheva → What we have measured A caveat kept in the only report we hold that says the rejection was of a promo, not the finished film ×1A different word, and a hedge Calls the same event an airstrike rather than a controlled demolition, and marks it "Reported" while offering footage as its evidence. ×1An allegation stated as established the headline presents the plan as fact and as a disclosure, with no attribution to the charge sheet ×1Asserted flat Calls it a 'terror network' and says Iran helped build it, in its own voice, with no source. ×1 from 2982 articles we hold · quote attached Outlet profile in The AI Times → —
The only report on the journalists' union defending the makers, and the only one that names critics: journalists Amit Segal and Noam Amir.
The Union of Journalists defended the film's creators amid threats and violent reactions, prompting sharp criticism from journalists Amit Segal and Noam Amir.
Who is named as acting: threats reported with no one named as making them — “amid threats and violent reactions”
Who is named as acting: critics of the union named in full — “prompting sharp criticism from journalists Amit Segal and Noam Amir”
Who is named as acting: threats against the filmmakers, no one named as making them — “amid threats and violent reactions”
Whose voice: critics of the union named in full — “sharp criticism from journalists Amit Segal and Noam Amir”
Read it at Arutz Sheva → https://www.israelnationalnews.com/flashes/693564
Haaretz
Centre-left estimate · not a score
Haaretz 🇮🇱IL · newspaper · independent If the world listened to Palestinians, NAZA wouldn't be necessary Open this report in The AI Times → Read it at Haaretz → What we have measured A previous framing corrected the twelve-country statement described as ambiguously worded ×1Asserted flat The report states as fact that barring Arab parties is a standing ritual. ×1Asserted flat The report says ethnicity explains the different outcomes, in its own voice. ×1Asserted in the report's own voice Parties are characterised by what they are said to promise, unattributed, and the headline calls the result frightening. ×1 from 1936 articles we hold · quote attached Outlet profile in The AI Times → — independent
The only report arguing that the film got attention because Israelis, not Palestinians, describe the atrocities.
oNavigationAccount Details Haaretz - back to home page SearchAccessibility Current section Ad-free and in a comfortable reading format The controversial Israeli documentary film is the latest example of the world paying attention to atrocities committed against the Palestinians, only once they are described from the perspective of Israelis Last month, when I was reading the news about the Israeli military's acknowledgment of firing on the car where Hind Rajab and her family were hiding, I was wondering why this acknowledgment was making headlines all over the world, as if it contained any new
Asserted versus attributed: atrocities stated in the report's own voice, no actor named in the span — “atrocities committed against the Palestinians”
Asserted vs attributed: atrocities stated flat, with no one named as committing them — “atrocities committed against the Palestinians”
Read it at Haaretz → https://www.haaretz.com/opinion/2026-09-15/ty-article-opinion/.premium/…
A Al-Modon
Centre-left estimate · not a score
Al-Modon 🇱🇧LB · digital · فيلم "نازا" يفضح إسرائيل: الجيش يستنفر...والمُخرج مُهدد Open this report in The AI Times → Read it at Al-Modon → What we have measured Actor left unnamed a man is killed by an air strike in the headline with nobody named as striking; shelling and demolitions simply "continue" ×1Actor named The Israeli army is named as the shooter. ×1Actor named, action nominalised Israeli escalation is named but arrives as a wave, not as a doer ×1Affected people The only report that looks at people in the south: the explosions, the fear and the displacement. ×1 from 3381 articles we hold · quote attached Outlet profile in The AI Times → —
The only report that says the Israeli army is on alert over the film. The claim is in its headline, and the text we hold does not explain it.
حجم الخط مشاركة عبر أثار فوز الفيلم الوثائقي "نازا" الذي يوثق الجرائم الإسرائيلية بحق المدنيين في قطاع غزة، بجائزة لجنة التحكيم الخاصة في مهرجان البندقية السينمائي، موجة جدل في إسرائيل، بعدما هدد وزير الثقافة الإسرائيلي ميكي زوهار، بسحب الجنسية من صانعَيّ الفيلم، يوفال أبراهام وراشيل تسور، متهماً إياهما بالإضرار بالدولة خلال فترة الحرب. وفاز الثنائي بالجائزة يوم السبت 12 سبتمبر/أيلول عن فيلمهما الوثائقي الذي يتناول الضربات الجوية الإسرائيلية على قطاع غزة، ويتضمن اتهامات للجيش الإسرائيلي بالتسبب في مقتل أعداد كبيرة من المدنيين.
Asserted versus attributed: Israeli crimes stated flat as what the film documents — “الذي يوثق الجرائم الإسرائيلية بحق المدنيين في قطاع”
Who is named as acting: director 'threatened', with no one named behind the threat — “والمُخرج مُهدد”
Asserted vs attributed: Israeli crimes against civilians stated in the report's own voice — “الذي يوثق الجرائم الإسرائيلية بحق المدنيين”
Who is named as acting: director threatened, no one named as threatening — “والمُخرج مُهدد”
Read it at Al-Modon → https://www.almodon.com/media/2026/09/15/%D9%81%D9%8A%D9%84%D9%85-%D9%8…
Checked, didn’t cover
Palestine TV · Palestinian Broadcasting Corporation
State / loyalist estimate · not a score
Palestine TV · Palestinian Broadcasting Corporation 🇵🇸PS · TV/radio · state-controlled No report held from this outlet on this story. What we have measured Asserted versus attributed recognition itself stated as fact ×1Attribution 'historic' attributed to the Palestinian ambassador ×1Dead counted, not named two dead are counted as 'citizens' and none are named; the wounded are not counted ×1Dead named Gives the dead man's full name and age. ×1 from 766 articles we hold · quote attached Outlet profile in The AI Times → IRNA (Islamic Republic News Agency)
State / loyalist estimate · not a score
IRNA (Islamic Republic News Agency) 🇮🇷IR · state agency · state-controlled No report held from this outlet on this story. What we have measured A contested word in the headline "illegal" is a Chinese spokesperson's characterisation, carried unmarked in the headline ×1A contested word taken as the report's own "illegal" appears in the headline without quotation marks or attribution to the speaker ×1Acted upon, never acting police are named as acting; whoever hoarded a billion toman of staples is not named at all ×1Actor label The Houthi-run authority is called Yemen's transport ministry. ×1 from 15038 articles we hold · quote attached Outlet profile in The AI Times → Ynet
Centre estimate · not a score
Ynet 🇮🇱IL · digital · independent No report held from this outlet on this story. What we have measured A claim in the headline that the other reports very close to deciding the regime appears in one report only ×1Active voice The killers are the subject of the verbs 'beat' and 'burned'. ×1Active voice The killers are named as acting ×1Army's term, attributed the army names the target of its strikes, and no one on the other side is quoted ×1 from 2684 articles we hold · quote attached Outlet profile in The AI Times → North Press Agency
Centre estimate · not a score
North Press Agency 🇸🇾SY · wire · independent No report held from this outlet on this story. What we have measured Attribution the damage list is carried in full, attributed to the side claiming it ×1Single official source Uses the Saudi Press Agency's account: 'bilateral relations', with no mention of reconstruction or money. ×1What is at stake presents the stakes as trade and energy security; no ship, crew or price is counted ×1Which line is led with led by the legal instrument, naming the Security Council resolution by number ×1 from 1169 articles we hold · quote attached Outlet profile in The AI Times → Shargh
Centre-left estimate · not a score
Shargh 🇮🇷IR · newspaper · independent No report held from this outlet on this story. What we have measured A count with its base both days given, and the data called preliminary ×1Actor named as a state the attack is Yemen's, not the Houthis' ×1A different actor does the asking Pakistan's army chief, not Beijing, is the one asking Tehran to use its influence, on the word of unnamed Pakistani government sources. ×1'aggression' in the narration The US campaign is called aggression in the report's own narration, which it credits to Al-Ahram's account of the call. ×1 from 10199 articles we hold · quote attached Outlet profile in The AI Times → Al-Monitor
Centre estimate · not a score
Al-Monitor 🇺🇸US/ME · digital · independent No report held from this outlet on this story. What we have measured Actor from anonymous officials Puts the IRGC at the trigger in a sentence sourc ×1Actor named Names the Director-General as the one who requested the dismissal ×1Actor named names Trump as the one who began the war, with Israel ×1Actor named names Israel as the actor in its military actions against the Palestinians ×1 from 1566 articles we hold · quote attached Outlet profile in The AI Times → Tehran Times
State / loyalist estimate · not a score
Tehran Times 🇮🇷IR · newspaper · state-controlled No report held from this outlet on this story. What we have measured Asserted vs attributed headline states the seizure flat; the body attributes it to the claimant ×1Attribution the toll is attributed to a body that is described but not named ×1Headline against body headline states the seizure flat; the body attributes it to the IRGC ×1How the objectors are framed opposition is described as protesters speaking for civilians ×1 from 1753 articles we hold · quote attached Outlet profile in The AI Times → Al Jazeera English
Centre estimate · not a score
Al Jazeera English 🇶🇦QA · TV/radio · state-funded international No report held from this outlet on this story. What we have measured Accusation attributed Cuba's charge is attributed to its foreign minister, not stated as fact ×1Actor named The headline names Israel as the actor and gives a count of three that includes a child. ×1Agency No actor is named for the detentions. The raids, not the soldiers, 'left' the town in lockdown ×1Agency Names Israel as the actor in the headline, in active voice ×1 from 4959 articles we hold · quote attached Outlet profile in The AI Times → An-Nahar
Centre estimate · not a score
An-Nahar 🇱🇧LB · newspaper · independent No report held from this outlet on this story. What we have measured Accused named the accused is named and his age is given ×1Accused named names the accused and gives his age ×1A contested finding relayed with the case still the prime minister's claim carried, with the court proceedings noted in the same sentence ×1Active voice and a toll in the background paragraph, the July strikes get named actors and counted dead — the only counted dead in this story ×1 from 10777 articles we hold · quote attached Outlet profile in The AI Times → LBCI (Lebanese Broadcasting Corporation International)
Centre estimate · not a score
LBCI (Lebanese Broadcasting Corporation International) 🇱🇧LB · TV/radio · independent No report held from this outlet on this story. What we have measured Active voice, actor named the Israeli army carried out the detonation ×1Actor framing Tehran calls the meeting. Iraq is the only other state named. ×1Actor left unnamed the strike in Iraqi waters has no one named as firing it — the source is "unknown" ×1Actor named names Israel as the one striking ×1 from 8159 articles we hold · quote attached Outlet profile in The AI Times →
Silence is recorded, not inferred — each of these was read when we built this story and carried nothing on this event.
We could not read these
K Kan · Israeli Public Broadcasting Corporation
Centre estimate · not a score
Kan · Israeli Public Broadcasting Corporation 🇮🇱IL · public broadcaster · public-service No report held from this outlet on this story. What we have measured Nothing scored yet. We do not carry a rating for any outlet — only what we have measured from published text. Outlet profile in The AI Times → The Times of Israel
Centre estimate · not a score
The Times of Israel 🇮🇱IL · digital · independent No report held from this outlet on this story. What we have measured Actorless in own voice The killing is passive with no shooter in the se ×1Headline carries the purpose The livestock and the army's reason are in the h ×1Headline frame The headline carries the military's word for the ×1Military words carried whole Both the label for the dead and the phrase for t ×1 from 149 articles we hold · quote attached Outlet profile in The AI Times → A Al-Sabaah
State / loyalist estimate · not a score
Al-Sabaah 🇮🇶IQ · newspaper · state-controlled No report held from this outlet on this story. What we have measured Nothing scored yet. We do not carry a rating for any outlet — only what we have measured from published text. Outlet profile in The AI Times → Ma'an News Agency
Centre estimate · not a score
Ma'an News Agency 🇵🇸PS · digital · independent No report held from this outlet on this story. What we have measured Nothing scored yet. We do not carry a rating for any outlet — only what we have measured from published text. Outlet profile in The AI Times → Al Rai
State / loyalist estimate · not a score
Al Rai 🇯🇴JO · newspaper · state-controlled No report held from this outlet on this story. What we have measured Nothing scored yet. We do not carry a rating for any outlet — only what we have measured from published text. Outlet profile in The AI Times → Al-Mada
Centre-left estimate · not a score
Al-Mada 🇮🇶IQ · newspaper · independent No report held from this outlet on this story. What we have measured Nothing scored yet. We do not carry a rating for any outlet — only what we have measured from published text. Outlet profile in The AI Times → WAFA · Palestinian News & Information Agency
State / loyalist estimate · not a score
WAFA · Palestinian News & Information Agency 🇵🇸PS · state agency · state-controlled No report held from this outlet on this story. What we have measured Nothing scored yet. We do not carry a rating for any outlet — only what we have measured from published text. Outlet profile in The AI Times → SANA (Syrian Arab News Agency)
State / loyalist estimate · not a score
SANA (Syrian Arab News Agency) 🇸🇾SY · state agency · state-controlled No report held from this outlet on this story. What we have measured Nothing scored yet. We do not carry a rating for any outlet — only what we have measured from published text. Outlet profile in The AI Times → Al-Manar
State-owned, sometimes critical estimate · not a score
Al-Manar 🇱🇧LB · TV/radio · independent No report held from this outlet on this story. What we have measured Nothing scored yet. We do not carry a rating for any outlet — only what we have measured from published text. Outlet profile in The AI Times → Galei Tzahal (Army Radio)
State / loyalist estimate · not a score
Galei Tzahal (Army Radio) 🇮🇱IL · TV/radio · state-controlled No report held from this outlet on this story. What we have measured Nothing scored yet. We do not carry a rating for any outlet — only what we have measured from published text. Outlet profile in The AI Times → Middle East Eye
Centre-left estimate · not a score
Middle East Eye 🇬🇧UK · digital · independent No report held from this outlet on this story. What we have measured How hard the claim is stated Its own body says the investigators did not attribute the network to the Emirati state — the qualification its headline drops. ×1How hard the claim is stated The body withdraws in one line the attribution its own headline makes ×1How deeply it is sourced Cites its own past reporting as the evidence for the claim in its own headline, and calls the evidence widespread in its own voice ×1How deeply it is sourced Offers its own past reporting as the evidence supporting the claim in its headline, inside the same sentence that carries the denial. ×1 from 125 articles we hold · quote attached Outlet profile in The AI Times → Ammon News
Centre estimate · not a score
Ammon News 🇯🇴JO · digital · independent No report held from this outlet on this story. What we have measured Nothing scored yet. We do not carry a rating for any outlet — only what we have measured from published text. Outlet profile in The AI Times →
These are must-cite outlets for this desk that we did not manage to read when we built this story. That is a gap in our reach, not a silence on their part, and it is not evidence of anything about this story.

Sign in to The AI Times

Everything is free while we are building it. Signing in is how comments, likes and your reading stay yours.

Continue with Google

Sign-in is coming soon.

By continuing you agree to be a reader of a paper that shows its working.
×