Reuters sources say the US and Iran are discussing a phased deal on Hormuz; Rubio says there were 'no breakthroughs'
Reuters cites sources it does not name. They say Washington and Tehran are discussing a phased deal to reopen the Strait of Hormuz and end the US blockade. The New York Times quotes Secretary of State Marco Rubio: talks on Iran's nuclear program have restarted, with no breakthroughs. None of the three reports we hold quotes Iran.
Two accounts on one day. On 24 September Reuters reported that the US and Iran "discuss phased deal to reopen Hormuz and end US blockade". Its only source is "sources say". About 16 hours earlier, The New York Times reported that Secretary of State Marco Rubio said US negotiators "had restarted conversations about Iran's nuclear program, but that there were no breakthroughs."
They may not describe the same talks. Reuters' sources talk about the strait and the blockade. Rubio, in the Times report, talks about the nuclear program.
| Reuters | The New York Times | |
|---|---|---|
| Subject | Reopening Hormuz, ending the US blockade | Iran's nuclear program |
| How far | A "phased deal" under discussion | "No breakthroughs" |
| Source | Not named | Rubio, by name |
| Published (UTC) | 16:35 | 00:18 |
Pressure at the same time. A second Reuters report says new US "D-Day" sanctions have taken effect and Iranian flights were cancelled. The part we hold does not say who gave the sanctions that name or who cancelled the flights. The same report says the Saudis say they shot down Houthi missiles.
What is not settled - Whether a phased deal is on the table. Only unnamed sources say so. - Whether Rubio's "no breakthroughs" still stood by the time of the Reuters report. His remark was published first. - What Iran says. No report we hold quotes an Iranian official. - The detail. We hold only the headline or first line of each report.
What this is about: whether the United States and Iran are negotiating a way out of a confrontation that has closed one of the world's main oil routes.
How it got here. The US and Iran have been hostile since Iran's 1979 revolution and the seizure of the US embassy in Tehran. The main dispute for two decades has been Iran's nuclear program. In 2015 Iran signed the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action with the US, the UK, France, Germany, Russia, China and the EU. Iran accepted limits on uranium enrichment in return for sanctions relief. In 2018, in his first term, President Donald Trump withdrew the US from the deal and reimposed sanctions. Iran then expanded its enrichment. The war in Gaza began after the Hamas attacks of 7 October 2023. After that, Iran and Israel struck each other directly in 2024. In June 2025 Israel attacked Iran, and the US bombed Iranian nuclear sites. The reports we hold now describe a US blockade and a crisis that the Times says is widening.
The actors. - The United States: Trump has been president since January 2025. Marco Rubio is his Secretary of State and leads the diplomacy. - Iran: the country on the northern shore of the strait. Its nuclear program is at the centre of the dispute. - Saudi Arabia and the Houthis: the Houthis are an Iran-aligned movement that controls much of northern Yemen. Saudi Arabia has fought them since 2015. Their clashes are a second front in the region.
The Strait of Hormuz is the narrow channel between Iran and Oman. It is the only sea route out of the Persian Gulf, and much of the Gulf's oil and gas exports pass through it. Oil is priced on a world market, so when the strait shuts, fuel costs rise far from the Gulf.
What is at stake. A deal that reopens the strait would ease that pressure. Without one, the blockade and the sanctions continue.
Where it stands. On 24 September new US sanctions took effect. On the same day, one account said a phased deal was being discussed, and Rubio said there had been no breakthroughs.
The story so far
- Kennedy says the US will be out of Iran 'in about 6 months'; Waltz says there is 'no timeline' · 21 Sep 2026
- MSNBC prices the Iran war at "$38 billion", "a minimum"; the Times asks if it is a "forever war" · 16 Sep 2026
Earlier stories The AI Times filed on this thread.
What is being argued about
- Whether the US and Iran are discussing a phased deal to reopen Hormuz. Only unnamed sources say so.
- Rubio's account: nuclear talks have restarted, with no breakthroughs.
- New US 'D-Day' sanctions taking effect as Iranian flights are cancelled.
- What Iran says. None of the reports we hold quotes an Iranian official.
Claims and verdicts
Reuters
Reuters
🇺🇸US ·
wire · independent
The New York Times
The New York Times
🇺🇸US ·
newspaper · independent
Reuters
Reuters
🇺🇸US ·
wire · independent
Who wrote it
The New York Times
Coverage, outlet by outlet
Reuters
Reuters
🇺🇸US ·
wire · independent
Reuters
Reuters
🇺🇸US ·
wire · independent
The New York Times
The New York Times
🇺🇸US ·
newspaper · independent
Mother Jones
Mother Jones
🇺🇸US ·
magazine · independent
What we have measured
Asserted, not attributed 'ultra-gerrymandered' stated as fact ×1Asserted versus attributed 'Cover-up' is asserted in the report's own voice, not attributed ×1Asserted versus attributed calls it a cover-up in its own voice ×1Assertion vs attribution describes the operation as a 'violent occupation' in its own voice, with no source for the phrase ×1
Outlet profile in The AI Times →
N
NPR
Fox News
Fox News
🇺🇸US ·
TV/radio · independent
What we have measured
Accused named Names one former fraternity member through his lawyer's denial. The woman is anonymous by her own choice. ×1Actor in headline The headline names Trump as the one acting. The body names only Anduril. ×1A number, with no people named The only report that gives a figure counts the journalists whose communications were swept up. It names none of them. ×1Asserted, not attributed stated flat: past court defeats are asserted with no case, judge or date named ×1
Outlet profile in The AI Times →
Breitbart
Breitbart
🇺🇸US ·
digital · independent
What we have measured
Anyone hurt is counted, not named eight deaths given as a number only ×1Framing of motive The lede calls the denial a punishment and puts 'fake news' in quotation marks; the officials being sued are left unnamed ×1How the person shot is named a status, not a name: the only report that never uses either name calls him an illegal alien ×1How the place is described a party label attached to the city in the same clause as the casualty count ×1
Outlet profile in The AI Times →
MSNBC
MSNBC
🇺🇸US ·
TV/radio · independent
What we have measured
Accuser not named The lede does not name the senator making the accusation ×1Actor named for the ban The White House is the subject of both verbs: it blocked journalists, then let CNN back in. ×1A first stated flat a never-before claim carried without a source attached ×1Asserted, not attributed absence of fraud evidence stated as fact ×1
Outlet profile in The AI Times →
The Hill
The Hill
🇺🇸US ·
digital · independent
What we have measured
Accusation attributed the word lying is placed in a named politician's mouth, not the outlet's ×1Actor named No actor named for who kept reporters out ×1Actor named No actor named for who let reporters back in ×1Actor named Names the state as the one that carried out the execution. ×1
Outlet profile in The AI Times →
National Review
National Review
🇺🇸US ·
magazine · independent
What we have measured
Asserted not attributed Doubt about the allegation is stated flat, in the outlet's own voice ×1Asserted not attributed An argument about deterrence is stated as fact ×1Asserted versus attributed calls it an abuse of power in its own voice ×1Asserted versus attributed 'Abuse of presidential power' is stated flat ×1
Outlet profile in The AI Times →
The Wall Street Journal
The Wall Street Journal
🇺🇸US ·
newspaper · independent
What we have measured
Outlet profile in The AI Times →