The AI Times
United States
Read another desk
All Geopolitics & international affairsEconomyUnited StatesAnglosphereEuropeRussia & EurasiaLevant & Iran Gulf & Türkiye North Africa Africa South Asia East Asia Latin America Energy Technology Media Watch
Sections
News Panel Outlets Headlines Analysis & editorial coming soon
Who we are Alerts Pricing Sign in / up
Desks
All Geopolitics & international affairsEconomyUnited StatesAnglosphereEuropeRussia & EurasiaLevant & Iran Gulf & Türkiye North Africa Africa South Asia East Asia Latin America Energy Technology Media Watch
The AI Times
every claim sourced| every source shown| always on watch

Trump says "No damage. No nothing"; Reuters says a US official reports aircraft hit in Jordan

Two reports, 28 minutes apart, answer the same question in opposite directions. Neither names the official. Neither counts the aircraft.

No photograph was published with any report we hold on this story.
No photograph was published with any report we hold on this story. The mark is The Hill’s.

The claim. Reuters' headline — the only text we hold from it — says Iran's attack on an air base in Jordan damaged US military aircraft, "a US official says". The official is not named.

The denial. The Hill reports Trump denying it by phone to NewsNation's Robert Sherman. Asked whether there was "any truth" to the reports: "Nope." Then: "None whatsoever. No damage. No nothing."

The Hill Reuters
US aircraft damaged denied asserted
Who says so Trump, quoted directly an unnamed US official
Aircraft counted none none
Anyone hurt not said not said
Published, 10 September 15:50 UTC 16:18 UTC

Who gets to speak. The president is the only person quoted in his own words in either report. Neither report names the official who says planes were hit. The Hill's headline is the denial; the reporting being denied is compressed into a half-sentence — "CBS News, citing people" — that breaks off there. We hold no CBS report.

What is not settled. Whether any US aircraft were damaged. How many aircraft were at the base, or involved. Whether anyone was hurt, on either side. Neither of the two reports we hold sets the two accounts against each other, and neither gives a number the other could be tested against.

This story is about whether an Iranian attack on an air base in Jordan damaged American military aircraft. The president says it did not. An unnamed US official says it did.

How it got here

  • 1979–80: Iran's revolution founded the Islamic Republic. The United States cut diplomatic ties in 1980 after the seizure of its embassy in Tehran. The two countries have had no relations since.
  • 2015–2018: Iran agreed to limits on its nuclear programme in exchange for sanctions relief. In 2018, in his first term, Donald Trump withdrew the United States from that deal. Tensions rose again.
  • 7 October 2023: Hamas attacked Israel, and the war in Gaza followed. Iran backs Hamas and other armed groups in the region. In 2024, Iran and Israel struck each other's territory directly for the first time.
  • June 2025: Israel and Iran fought a short war. The United States joined it by bombing Iranian nuclear sites. Iran answered by firing at a US base in Qatar.
  • September 2026: Our coverage from 4 September was already reporting an Iran war. Vice President JD Vance refused to call it one. Seven of the nine reports we held on that story used the word anyway.

Who is involved, and why

  • The United States keeps forces across the Middle East, Jordan included, to protect allies and its own troops. Donald Trump has been president since January 2025. He is commander-in-chief.
  • Iran treats American bases in the region as targets in a war it says it did not start. That claim is disputed.
  • Jordan is a US ally and borders Israel, Syria, Iraq and Saudi Arabia. Since 2021 a defence agreement has allowed American forces to operate from its bases. That puts it in the line of fire without being a party to the war.

What is at stake

If Iran can reach and damage US aircraft in a third country, the war has spread beyond Iran and Israel. How far the United States is committed also depends on what its government admits has been lost. Under the War Powers Resolution of 1973, Congress's say over military action depends on knowing what that action costs.

Where it stands

The two accounts contradict each other. Neither gives a number that could be checked against the other.

What is being argued about

  • Whether Iran's attack on an air base in Jordan damaged US military aircraft
  • Trump's denial by phone, and the unnamed official who says otherwise
  • Unnamed sourcing on both sides of the dispute
  • What neither report counts: aircraft, or anyone hurt
Two reports, opposite answersSide by side
ReportUS aircraft damaged?Who says soHedged?
The HillNo — "None whatsoever. No damage. No nothing."Trump, quoted directlyNo. The denial is stated flat, and it is the headline.
ReutersYes — the attack "damaged US military aircraft"a US official, not namedAttributed, not hedged: "a US official says", in the headline.
Both reports are ledes only; the columns quote what each one actually carries.
Sources The Hill
Centre estimate · not a score
The Hill 🇺🇸US · digital · independent Trump says ‘no damage’ to US war planes from Iran attack Open this report in The AI Times → Read it at The Hill → What we have measured Accusation attributed the word lying is placed in a named politician's mouth, not the outlet's ×1Actor named No actor named for who kept reporters out ×1Actor named No actor named for who let reporters back in ×1Actor named Names the state as the one that carried out the execution. ×1 from 4315 articles we hold · quote attached Outlet profile in The AI Times →
Reuters
Centre estimate · not a score
Reuters 🇺🇸US · wire · independent Ataque do Irã a base na Jordânia danificou aeronaves militares dos EUA, diz autoridade norte-americana · no time published Open this report in The AI Times → Read it at Reuters → What we have measured Actor named The attacker is the subject of an active verb for both the deaths and the damage ×1Actor named No actor named for who cancelled the flights ×1Agreement stated flat, source in a tail attribution moved after the dash ×1Announcement written as settled A social-media post becomes a future indicative: the conversion will happen ×1 from 13380 articles we hold · quote attached Outlet profile in The AI Times →
28 minutes apartTimeline
  1. Thu 10 Sep15:50 published time The Hill reports Trump denying that Iranian forces damaged US war planes at an air base in Jordan no aircraft countedcites CBS News as reporting the damage, in a sentence that breaks off
  2. Thu 10 Sep16:18 published time Reuters headline says Iran's attack on a base in Jordan damaged US military aircraft no aircraft countedsourced to a US official who is not named
Sources The Hill
Centre estimate · not a score
The Hill 🇺🇸US · digital · independent Trump says ‘no damage’ to US war planes from Iran attack Open this report in The AI Times → Read it at The Hill → What we have measured Accusation attributed the word lying is placed in a named politician's mouth, not the outlet's ×1Actor named No actor named for who kept reporters out ×1Actor named No actor named for who let reporters back in ×1Actor named Names the state as the one that carried out the execution. ×1 from 4315 articles we hold · quote attached Outlet profile in The AI Times →
Reuters
Centre estimate · not a score
Reuters 🇺🇸US · wire · independent Ataque do Irã a base na Jordânia danificou aeronaves militares dos EUA, diz autoridade norte-americana · no time published Open this report in The AI Times → Read it at Reuters → What we have measured Actor named The attacker is the subject of an active verb for both the deaths and the damage ×1Actor named No actor named for who cancelled the flights ×1Agreement stated flat, source in a tail attribution moved after the dash ×1Announcement written as settled A social-media post becomes a future indicative: the conversion will happen ×1 from 13380 articles we hold · quote attached Outlet profile in The AI Times →
The bias in this coverageBias

Two reports, two opposite facts

One report says planes were damaged, sourced to an unnamed American official. The other quotes the president denying it in four words and compresses the reporting he is denying into a broken half-sentence. Neither report puts the two accounts side by side.

2 reports we hold on this 1 reports that quote the president directly 0 reports that name the official who says planes were hit

Nobody says how many planes

The dispute is about aircraft, and no report we hold gives a number of them. No report names or counts anyone hurt on either side. What we can say is that one report asserts damage and one denies it.

0 reports giving a number of aircraft 0 reports naming or counting anyone hurt
Scored without the mastheads. Where the two passes differ, both are kept.
Sources The Hill
Centre estimate · not a score
The Hill 🇺🇸US · digital · independent Trump says ‘no damage’ to US war planes from Iran attack Open this report in The AI Times → Read it at The Hill → What we have measured Accusation attributed the word lying is placed in a named politician's mouth, not the outlet's ×1Actor named No actor named for who kept reporters out ×1Actor named No actor named for who let reporters back in ×1Actor named Names the state as the one that carried out the execution. ×1 from 4315 articles we hold · quote attached Outlet profile in The AI Times →
Reuters
Centre estimate · not a score
Reuters 🇺🇸US · wire · independent Ataque do Irã a base na Jordânia danificou aeronaves militares dos EUA, diz autoridade norte-americana · no time published Open this report in The AI Times → Read it at Reuters → What we have measured Actor named The attacker is the subject of an active verb for both the deaths and the damage ×1Actor named No actor named for who cancelled the flights ×1Agreement stated flat, source in a tail attribution moved after the dash ×1Announcement written as settled A social-media post becomes a future indicative: the conversion will happen ×1 from 13380 articles we hold · quote attached Outlet profile in The AI Times →

Claims and verdicts

unverified Trump denied that any US war planes were damaged.
Only The Hill carries the exchange, quoting Trump by phone to NewsNation's Robert Sherman: "None whatsoever. No damage. No nothing." No other report we hold repeats or contradicts the quote, and one account is not corroboration.
Checked against 1 source:
The Hill
Centre estimate · not a score
The Hill 🇺🇸US · digital · independent Trump says ‘no damage’ to US war planes from Iran attack Open this report in The AI Times → Read it at The Hill → What we have measured Accusation attributed the word lying is placed in a named politician's mouth, not the outlet's ×1Actor named No actor named for who kept reporters out ×1Actor named No actor named for who let reporters back in ×1Actor named Names the state as the one that carried out the execution. ×1 from 4315 articles we hold · quote attached Outlet profile in The AI Times →
disputed Iran's attack on an air base in Jordan damaged US military aircraft.
A Reuters headline — the only text we hold from it — says a US official reported damaged US aircraft, and The Hill notes CBS News reported the same citing unnamed people. Trump told NewsNation there was "no damage. No nothing", so the two accounts we hold contradict each other.
Checked against 2 sources:
Reuters
Centre estimate · not a score
Reuters 🇺🇸US · wire · independent Ataque do Irã a base na Jordânia danificou aeronaves militares dos EUA, diz autoridade norte-americana · no time published Open this report in The AI Times → Read it at Reuters → What we have measured Actor named The attacker is the subject of an active verb for both the deaths and the damage ×1Actor named No actor named for who cancelled the flights ×1Agreement stated flat, source in a tail attribution moved after the dash ×1Announcement written as settled A social-media post becomes a future indicative: the conversion will happen ×1 from 13380 articles we hold · quote attached Outlet profile in The AI Times →
The Hill
Centre estimate · not a score
The Hill 🇺🇸US · digital · independent Trump says ‘no damage’ to US war planes from Iran attack Open this report in The AI Times → Read it at The Hill → What we have measured Accusation attributed the word lying is placed in a named politician's mouth, not the outlet's ×1Actor named No actor named for who kept reporters out ×1Actor named No actor named for who let reporters back in ×1Actor named Names the state as the one that carried out the execution. ×1 from 4315 articles we hold · quote attached Outlet profile in The AI Times →

Who wrote it

M Max Rego The Hill
What the bias passes found in their reporting
Actor named No actor named for who kept reporters out×1
Asymmetric labelling the Democratic leader is given his state without a party letter, where the same-shaped report on the Speaker gives party and state×1
Attributed prediction The six-month exit is Kennedy's prediction and is attributed to him×1
Cost acknowledged the costs are stated as prices, not as lives×1
Claims we checked that rest on their reporting
2 misleading3 disputed5 unverified8 true
From 229 reports we hold under this byline, at The Hill. Two independent readings, each made without the masthead, a quote attached to every tag. A record, never a rating. Their full record →
The bylines on the reports this story is built from. Hover one for what our passes have measured on their reporting. · 1 report we hold carries no byline — we do not invent one.

Coverage, outlet by outlet

Reuters
Centre estimate · not a score
Reuters 🇺🇸US · wire · independent Ataque do Irã a base na Jordânia danificou aeronaves militares dos EUA, diz autoridade norte-americana · no time published Open this report in The AI Times → Read it at Reuters → What we have measured Actor named The attacker is the subject of an active verb for both the deaths and the damage ×1Actor named No actor named for who cancelled the flights ×1Agreement stated flat, source in a tail attribution moved after the dash ×1Announcement written as settled A social-media post becomes a future indicative: the conversion will happen ×1 from 13380 articles we hold · quote attached Outlet profile in The AI Times →
— independent
The only report asserting the damage; a headline is all we hold of it, and it rests the claim on a US official it does not name.
Damage stated flat, carried by one unnamed: asserted, attribution unnamed — “Ataque do Irã a base na Jordânia danificou aeronaves militares dos EUA, diz autoridade norte-americana”
Who is named as acting: the attack acts on the aircraft; the source is an official who is not named — “Ataque do Irã a base na Jordânia danificou aeronaves militares dos EUA, diz autoridade norte-americana”
Read it at Reuters → https://www.reuters.com/pt/mundo/H2WFSBDGHVIOVLBO5USAV3GZQA-2026-09-10/
The Hill
Centre estimate · not a score
The Hill 🇺🇸US · digital · independent Trump says ‘no damage’ to US war planes from Iran attack Open this report in The AI Times → Read it at The Hill → What we have measured Accusation attributed the word lying is placed in a named politician's mouth, not the outlet's ×1Actor named No actor named for who kept reporters out ×1Actor named No actor named for who let reporters back in ×1Actor named Names the state as the one that carried out the execution. ×1 from 4315 articles we hold · quote attached Outlet profile in The AI Times →
— independent
The only report that quotes Trump — "None whatsoever. No damage. No nothing." — and the only one that names who asked him: NewsNation's Robert Sherman, by phone.
President Trump on Thursday denied reports that Iranian forces damaged U.S. war planes during a raid on an air base in Jordan. “Nope,” the president said when NewsNation’s Robert Sherman asked whether there is “any truth” to the reports. “None whatsoever. No damage. No nothing,” Trump told Sherman over the phone. CBS News, citing people…
Headline leads with the denial, not the dispute: denial is the news — “Trump says ‘no damage’ to US war planes from Iran attack”
Whose voice is quoted, and at what length: the president, three times; nobody on the other side — ““None whatsoever. No damage. No nothing,” Trump told Sherman over the phone.”
The countering account is cut to a fragment: sourcing breaks off mid-sentence — “CBS News, citing people…”
Who is named as acting in the contested claim: Iranian forces named as the actor, inside a denial — “President Trump on Thursday denied reports that Iranian forces damaged U.S. war planes during a raid on an air base in Jordan.”
Nobody hurt is named or counted: no aircraft count, no casualties, in either direction — ““Nope,” the president said when NewsNation’s Robert Sherman asked whether there is “any truth” to the reports.”
Whose voice is quoted: the president quoted at length; no one on the other side quoted at all — ““None whatsoever. No damage. No nothing,” Trump told Sherman over the phone.”
How the counter claim is sourced: the account he denies is second-hand and its sources unnamed — “CBS News, citing people”
What the headline claims: the denial is the news; the contrary account is not in the headline — “Trump says ‘no damage’ to US war planes from Iran attack”
Who is named as acting: Iranian forces named as the actor inside the denial — “denied reports that Iranian forces damaged U.S. war planes during a raid on an air base in Jordan”
Read it at The Hill → https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/6081977-trump-denies-us-air…
Checked, didn’t cover
Mother Jones
Left estimate · not a score
Mother Jones 🇺🇸US · magazine · independent No report held from this outlet on this story. What we have measured Asserted, not attributed 'ultra-gerrymandered' stated as fact ×1Asserted versus attributed 'Cover-up' is asserted in the report's own voice, not attributed ×1Asserted versus attributed calls it a cover-up in its own voice ×1Assertion vs attribution describes the operation as a 'violent occupation' in its own voice, with no source for the phrase ×1 from 361 articles we hold · quote attached Outlet profile in The AI Times →
N NPR
Centre estimate · not a score
NPR 🇺🇸US · public broadcaster · independent No report held from this outlet on this story. What we have measured Asserted, not attributed that the system wrongly flagged citizens is stated flat, with no source named for it ×1Asserted versus attributed public disbelief stated as established, with nothing cited that measured it ×1Asserted versus attributed Past threats of force are stated flat, as background ×1Asymmetric labelling one side tagged by its patron, the other not ×1 from 1144 articles we hold · quote attached Outlet profile in The AI Times →
P Politico
Centre estimate · not a score
Politico 🇺🇸US · digital · independent No report held from this outlet on this story. What we have measured Nothing scored yet. We do not carry a rating for any outlet — only what we have measured from published text. Outlet profile in The AI Times →
T The Washington Post
Centre-left estimate · not a score
The Washington Post 🇺🇸US · newspaper · independent No report held from this outlet on this story. What we have measured Accused's denial carried the only report carrying the Marine's side ×1Actor named via accusation the administration is named as acting, through the ranchers' charge; the price rise is stated flat ×1Asserted, not attributed a shift of power to Iran stated flat in the headline ×1Asserted or attributed the headline states as data what the body shows the chair selecting in a speech ×1 from 1237 articles we hold · quote attached Outlet profile in The AI Times →
Fox News
Right estimate · not a score
Fox News 🇺🇸US · TV/radio · independent No report held from this outlet on this story. What we have measured Accused named Names one former fraternity member through his lawyer's denial. The woman is anonymous by her own choice. ×1Actor in headline The headline names Trump as the one acting. The body names only Anduril. ×1A number, with no people named The only report that gives a figure counts the journalists whose communications were swept up. It names none of them. ×1Asserted, not attributed stated flat: past court defeats are asserted with no case, judge or date named ×1 from 6432 articles we hold · quote attached Outlet profile in The AI Times →
Breitbart
Right estimate · not a score
Breitbart 🇺🇸US · digital · independent No report held from this outlet on this story. What we have measured Anyone hurt is counted, not named eight deaths given as a number only ×1Framing of motive The lede calls the denial a punishment and puts 'fake news' in quotation marks; the officials being sued are left unnamed ×1How the person shot is named a status, not a name: the only report that never uses either name calls him an illegal alien ×1How the place is described a party label attached to the city in the same clause as the casualty count ×1 from 3584 articles we hold · quote attached Outlet profile in The AI Times →
MSNBC
Left estimate · not a score
MSNBC 🇺🇸US · TV/radio · independent No report held from this outlet on this story. What we have measured Accuser not named The lede does not name the senator making the accusation ×1Actor named for the ban The White House is the subject of both verbs: it blocked journalists, then let CNN back in. ×1A first stated flat a never-before claim carried without a source attached ×1Asserted, not attributed absence of fraud evidence stated as fact ×1 from 1470 articles we hold · quote attached Outlet profile in The AI Times →
The New York Times
Centre-left estimate · not a score
The New York Times 🇺🇸US · newspaper · independent No report held from this outlet on this story. What we have measured Active and passive voice the ship is 'targeted' with no actor, one sentence before a named actor is given for the Saudi attack ×1Active vs passive voice Pike is named as the killer in the active voice; the botched execution has no actor named ×1Actor label Names the shooter by its backer, not by its own name. ×1Actor named Names the official and what the process did to Pike. ×1 from 3862 articles we hold · quote attached Outlet profile in The AI Times →
National Review
Centre-right estimate · not a score
National Review 🇺🇸US · magazine · independent No report held from this outlet on this story. What we have measured Asserted not attributed Doubt about the allegation is stated flat, in the outlet's own voice ×1Asserted not attributed An argument about deterrence is stated as fact ×1Asserted versus attributed calls it an abuse of power in its own voice ×1Asserted versus attributed 'Abuse of presidential power' is stated flat ×1 from 414 articles we hold · quote attached Outlet profile in The AI Times →
Silence is recorded, not inferred — each of these was read when we built this story and carried nothing on this event.
We could not read these
The Wall Street Journal
Centre-right estimate · not a score
The Wall Street Journal 🇺🇸US · newspaper · independent No report held from this outlet on this story. What we have measured Nothing scored yet. We do not carry a rating for any outlet — only what we have measured from published text. Outlet profile in The AI Times →
Associated Press
Centre estimate · not a score
Associated Press 🇺🇸US · wire · independent No report held from this outlet on this story. What we have measured Dating and attribution Dates the signing to Aug. 6, 2026 and writes ord ×1Dating and attribution Carries a dateline correction, repeated three ti ×1How hard the claim is stated Marks "birth tourism" as the administration's ow ×1How hard the claim is stated high ×1 from 223 articles we hold · quote attached Outlet profile in The AI Times →
These are must-cite outlets for this desk that we did not manage to read when we built this story. That is a gap in our reach, not a silence on their part, and it is not evidence of anything about this story.

Sign in to The AI Times

Everything is free while we are building it. Signing in is how comments, likes and your reading stay yours.

Continue with Google

Sign-in is coming soon.

By continuing you agree to be a reader of a paper that shows its working.

×